Journal of Systems Biology & Proteome Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-1518-081136

Case Report - Journal of Systems Biology & Proteome Research (2023) Volume 4, Issue 3

Advances in proteomics: Systems biology approaches for comprehensive proteome characterization

Kevin Serrano *

Department of Glycoproteomics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

*Corresponding Author:
Kevin Serrano
Department of Glycoproteomics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
E-mail: Serranok25@edu.us

Received: 02-May-2023, Manuscript No. AASBPR-23-100298; Editor assigned: 03-May-2023, PreQC No. AASBPR-23-100298(PQ); Reviewed:17-Jan-2023, QC No. AASBPR-23-100298; Revised:16-May-2023, Manuscript No. AASBPR-23-100298(R); Published:25-May-2023DOI:10.35841/aasbpr-4.3.143

Citation: Serrano K. Advances in proteomics: Systems biology approaches for comprehensive proteome characterization. J Syst Bio Proteome Res. 2023;4(3):143

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Systems Biology & Proteome Research

Introduction

Proteins are key players in cellular functions, governing various processes such as metabolism, signaling, and gene expression. The field of proteomics aims to understand the structure, function, and interactions of proteins within biological systems. Traditional proteomic techniques, such as 2D gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, have provided valuable insights into protein identification and quantification. However, the complexity and dynamic nature of proteomes necessitate the development of advanced methodologies [1].

Advances in Systems Biology Approaches

Systems biology approaches in proteomics integrate experimental data with computational modeling to generate a holistic understanding of cellular processes. Here are some notable advances in systems biology approaches for comprehensive proteome characterization [2].

High-Throughput Technologies

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has undergone tremendous advancements in recent years. The introduction of high-resolution mass spectrometers and improved sample preparation techniques has enabled the analysis of complex proteomes with unprecedented sensitivity and accuracy. Coupled with liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry facilitates the identification, quantification, and characterization of proteins on a large scale [3].

Quantitative Proteomics

Quantitative proteomics techniques have evolved to provide insights into protein expression levels, dynamics, and modifications. Label-based methods (e.g., SILAC, iTRAQ) and label-free approaches (e.g., SWATH-MS) allow for precise quantification of proteins in different biological conditions. These quantitative techniques enable the comparison of protein abundances across multiple samples, aiding in the identification of differentially expressed proteins and dynamic changes in protein profiles [4].

Computational Modeling and Data Integration

Systems biology approaches heavily rely on computational modeling and data integration to analyze large-scale proteomic datasets. Computational tools and algorithms aid in the interpretation of complex proteomic data, allowing the identification of protein functions, prediction of protein-protein interactions, and reconstruction of signaling networks. Integration of proteomic data with other omics data, such as genomics and transcriptomics, provides a comprehensive understanding of biological systems [5].

Applications and Future Perspectives

Quantitative proteomics techniques have evolved to provide insights into protein expression levels, dynamics, and modifications. Label-based methods (e.g., SILAC, iTRAQ) and label-free approaches (e.g., SWATH-MS) allow for precise quantification of proteins in different biological conditions. These quantitative techniques enable the comparison of protein abundances across multiple samples, aiding in the identification of differentially expressed proteins and dynamic changes in protein profiles [6].

Conclusion

Advances in proteomics, particularly through systems biology approaches, have revolutionized our understanding of cellular processes and the intricate workings of biological systems. The integration of high-throughput technologies, quantitative proteomics, interaction mapping.

References

  1. Monti C, Zilocchi M, Colugnat I, et al Proteomics turns functional. J Proteomics. 2019;198:36-44.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Armengaud J. Proteogenomics and systems biology: quest for the ultimate missing parts. Expert Rev Proteomics 2010;7(1):65-77.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Rees J, Lilley K. Enabling technologies for yeast proteome analysis. Yeast Syst. Biol.: Meth.and Protocols. 2011:149-78.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Yelamanchi SD, Kumar M, Madugundu AK. Characterization of human pineal gland proteome. . Mol Biosyst. 2016;12(12):3622-32..

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Li F, Li C, Wang M. GlycoMine: a machine learning-based approach for predicting N-, C-and O-linked glycosylation in the human proteome. Bioinform . 2015;31(9):1411-9.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App