Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Commentary - Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care (2025) Volume 9, Issue 2

Addressing Acne Scars with Cosmetic Resurfacing: Treatment Options and Results

Gary Handerson *

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Gary Handerson
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami, USA
E-mail: garyhanderson@aol.com

Received: 03-Apr -2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-163880; Editor assigned: 04-Apr-2025, PreQC No. AADRSC-25-163880 (PQ); Reviewed:18-Apr-2025, QC No. AADRSC-25-163880; Revised:23-Apr-2025, Manuscript No. AADRSC-25-163880 (R); Published:28-Apr-2025, DOI:10.35841/aara-9.2.264

Citation: Handerson G. Addressing acne scars with cosmetic resurfacing: Treatment options and results. Dermatol Res Skin Care. 2025; 9(2):265

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Dermatology Research and Skin Care

Introduction

Acne is one of the most common dermatological conditions, affecting nearly 85% of adolescents and a significant percentage of adults. While active acne may subside with time or treatment, the scars it leaves behind can persist and severely impact self-esteem [1].

Fortunately, cosmetic resurfacing techniques have evolved significantly and now offer highly effective solutions for improving the texture and appearance of acne-scarred skin. This article explores the types of acne scars, available resurfacing treatments, and clinical results associated with each option [2].

Acne scars are the result of inflammation within the dermis caused by acne lesions. As the skin attempts to repair itself, it may produce too much or too little collagen, leading to textural changes. There are several types of acne scars: Indented scars that sit below the surrounding skin [3].

Not true scars, but discoloration left after acne heals. Choosing the right treatment depends on scar type, skin tone, and individual preferences. Chemical peels involve applying a chemical solution to exfoliate the top layers of skin, promoting regeneration. Salicylic acid, glycolic acid, and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peels are commonly used for superficial atrophic scars and PIH. TCA CROSS (Chemical Reconstruction of Skin Scars), a focal technique, is particularly effective for ice pick scars [4].

Affordable, quick recovery, suitable for darker skin tones with proper care. Multiple sessions needed; less effective for deeper scars. Microneedling involves the use of fine needles to create micro-injuries in the skin, stimulating collagen and elastin production. Over time, skin texture improves and scars soften [5].

Fractional lasers create microthermal treatment zones that stimulate collagen remodeling while preserving surrounding tissue for faster healing. Ablative (CO?, Er:YAG) lasers remove skin layers, while non-ablative (1550 nm erbium glass) lasers heat tissue without ablation [6].

Effective for rolling and boxcar scars; significant improvement after 2–3 sessions. Downtime varies; risk of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in darker skin types. Dermabrasion involves mechanically exfoliating the outer skin layers using a rotating instrument. It's mainly used for superficial scars [7].

Microdermabrasion is a milder variant with limited efficacy on deep acne scars. Benefits: Cost-effective for mild scars. Less effective than lasers or microneedling for deeper scars. This is a minor surgical procedure where a needle is inserted under the skin to break fibrotic strands pulling the scar downward. It's especially effective for rolling scars [8].

Immediate lifting effect; often combined with fillers or lasers. Bruising, swelling, and potential temporary lumpiness. When combined with microneedling or laser, PRP can enhance healing and boost collagen formation, leading to better outcomes for acne scars [9].

Accelerates healing; improves texture and tone. Variable results; may require more sessions. The effectiveness of resurfacing procedures depends on scar type, depth, and the chosen method. Studies show: 31–62% improvement in atrophic scars after 4 sessions. Up to 75% improvement in rolling and boxcar scars after 3 sessions. Notable reduction in ice pick scar depth with minimal downtime [10].

Conclusion

Cosmetic resurfacing offers transformative potential for individuals struggling with acne scars. From chemical peels to advanced laser systems, a variety of safe and effective options exist. A personalized treatment plan often combining multiple techniques can significantly improve skin texture, tone, and confidence. As technology and techniques continue to evolve, outcomes will only improve, offering hope to millions worldwide.

References

  1. Kerscher M, Bayrhammer J, Reuther T. Rejuvenating influence of a stabilized hyaluronic acid–based gel of nonanimal origin on facial skin aging. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(5):720-6.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  3. Han SH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim YC, Choi GS, Shin JH. Skin rejuvenating effects of chemical peeling: a study in photoaged hairless mice. Intl J Dermatol. 2011;50(9):1075-82.
  4. Google Scholar

  5. Ramos?e?Silva M, da Silva Carneiro SC. Elderly skin and its rejuvenation: products and procedures for the aging skin. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6(1):40-50.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  7. Nordlund JJ, Grimes PE, Ortonne JP. The safety of hydroquinone. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(7):781-7.
  8. Google Scholar

  9. Tanghetti E, Harper JC, Oefelein MG. The efficacy and tolerability of dapsone 5% gel in female vs male patients with facial acne vulgaris: gender as a clinically relevant outcome variable. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11(12):1417-21.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Sarkar R, Bhalla M, Kanwar AJ. A comparative study of 20% azelaic acid cream monotherapy versus a sequential therapy in the treatment of melasma in dark-skinned patients. 2002;205(3):249-54.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

  13. Chan R, Park KC, Lee MH, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a fixed triple combination (fluocinolone acetonide 0• 01%, hydroquinone 4%, tretinoin 0• 05%) compared with hydroquinone 4% cream in Asian patients with moderate to severe melasma. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):697-703.
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Burns RL, Prevost?blank PL, Lawry MA, et al. Glycolic acid peels for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in black patients: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(3):171-5.
  16. Google Scholar

  17. Elsaie ML, Choudhary S, Leiva A, Nouri K. Nonablative radiofrequency for skin rejuvenation. Dermatol Sur. 2010;36(5):577-89.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Nilforoushzadeh MA, Amirkhani MA, Zarrintaj P, Salehi Moghaddam A, Mehrabi T, Alavi S, Mollapour Sisakht M. Skin care and rejuvenation by cosmeceutical facial mask. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(5):693-702.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref

Get the App