Biomedical Research

Research Article - Biomedical Research (2017) Volume 28, Issue 6

Relationships among gross domestic product per capita, government health expenditure per capita and infant mortality rate in China

Hongbin Li1*, Haijuang Feng2, Jie Wang1, Zhijuan Qian1 and Jianming Gu1

1Department of Child Healthcare, Maternal and Child Health Care Family Planning Service Center of Rugao, Nantong, Jiangsu, PR China

2Department of Internal Medicine, the People's Hospital of Rugao, Rugao, Jiangsu. PR China

*Corresponding Author:
Hongbin Li
Department of Child Healthcare
Maternal and Child Health Care Family Planning Service
Center of Rugao, PR China

Accepted on November 24, 2016

Visit for more related articles at Biomedical Research

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationships among Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, Government Health Expenditure (GHE) per capita and Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in China, and explore the new model to reduce the IMR. A periodic bivariate Pearson’s analysis was performed on the data of GDP per capita, GHE per capita and IMR in China from 1952 to 2014. The turning point for the effect of GDP per capita on IMR was sought. Then, the average development levels of these three indicators were compared. Finally, the decline characteristics of IMR were analysed. Results showed that, there was no relationship between GDP per capita and IMR from 1952 to 1970 (r=-0.393, p=0.096). GDP per capita and IMR were negatively correlated from 1970 to 2014 (r=-0.827, p=0.000). The stage from 1970 to 1975 was the initial turning point for the effect of GDP per capita on IMR (r=-0.980, p=0.001). From 1980 to 1995, the growth rate of GHE per capita (12.80%) was slower than that of GDP (17.26%), and the average decline rate of IMR was 2.82%. From 1995 to 2014, the average growth rate of GHE per capita (18.25%) was faster than GDP per capita (12.42%), and the average decline rate of IMR was significantly accelerated (7.15%). The negative correlation of GDP per capita and IMR does not always exist. The effect of GHE per capita on IMR is more obvious than that of GDP per capita. It is suggested to build a “surpass-growth and support” mode to reduce the IMR.

Keywords

Infant mortality rate, Gross domestic product, Government health expenditure, Relationship.

Introduction

Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is a comprehensive index reflecting the politics, economic, culture, education and health status of a country or region. In the process of building a welloff society in an all-round way, the IMR is an important index to measure the life-off index [1]. The economy is one of the important factors for IMR. In 2000-2009, the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita and the percentage of Government Health Expenditure (GHE) to GDP significantly affect the IMR in 53 African countries [2]. In 2004-2013, the GDP per capita and GHE per capita have a negative correlation with IMR in members of Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) [3]. A higher GDP per capita in 73 countries with armed conflict is associated with a reduction in IMR [4].

Researches also show that, there is a significant negative correlation between economic growth and IMR in China [5,6]. Have this negative relationship turned from a previous period of the past? Does this negative correlation exist in the future? These issues are still lack of in-depth study. Previous scholars have studied the relationship between rapid economic growth and IMR, and distinguished two successful types of model in reducing IMR. The first is growth-mediated type, which plays a role by high-speed economic growth. The second is supportled type, which plays a role not by high-speed economic growth, but by a well-planned social assistance program. When using China before the reform as the object of study, it is found that the rapid economic growth has not been achieved but the IMR rate has been reduced effectively. This is a typical example of “support-led” [7]. In the past 30 years of reform and opening up in China, what kind of type is suitable for the decline of IMR? This problem should be paid attention. Understanding the turning point of economic growth to the change of IMR has the guiding significance for the development and implementation of effective investment policies in poor areas and underdeveloped areas. Summarizing the successful types of prevention and control experience and exploration of new operating mechanisms will help to further reduce IMR. Based on the data of historical IMR [8-10] and national surveillance of IMR in China [11], this study investigated the relationships among GDP per capita, GHE per capita and IMR in China, and explored the new model to reduce the IMR. The objective was to provide a decisionmaking reference for benefiting the health of children's investment and support policies.

Materials and Methods

Sources of data

Data of IMR in China in 1952-1990 was derived from the literature [8-10], and those in 1991-2013 was derived from “the statistical yearbook of China, 2014” [11]. The data of GDP per capita in 1952-1977 were from the “Sixty years of statistical data compiled 1949-2008 in new China” [12], and those in 1978-2013 were from “China statistical yearbook 2014” [11]. In 2014, the data of IMR and GDP per capita were derived from “China's economic and social development statistics database” [13]. “China statistical yearbook 2014” only published the annual total health cost (100 million yuan), absolute number of GHE (100 million yuan) and health cost per capita (yuan). The GHE per capita was calculated as follows: GHE per capita=absolute GHE (100 million yuan)/ (total health cost (100 million yuan)/health cost per capita (yuan)) (Tables 1 and 2).

Year IMR GDP per capita Year IMR GDP per capita
1952 164.1 119 1965 99.6 240
1953 157.9 142 1966 95.8 255
1954 152 144 1967 92.2 236
1955 146.2 150 1968 88.7 223
1956 140.7 166 1969 85.4 244
1957 135.4 168 1970 82.2 276
1958 130.3 200 1971 79.1 290
1959 160 216 1972 76.1 294
1960 284 218 1973 73.2 310
1961 183 185 1974 70.5 311
1962 111.7 173 1975 67.8 329
1963 107.5 181 1976 65.2 318
1964 103.5 208 1977 62.8 341

Table 1. Date of IMR (%) and GDP per capita (yuan) in China in 1952-1977.

Year IMR GDP per capita GHE per capita Year IMR GDP per capita GHE per capita
1978 60.4 381 3.7 1997 33.1 6420 42.4
1979 58.1 419 4.2 1998 33.2 6796 47.3
1980 55.9 463 5.3 1999 33.3 7159 51
1981 60.1 492 6 2000 32.2 7858 56
1982 58.5 528 6.8 2001 30 8622 62.7
1983 56.9 583 7.5 2002 29.2 9398 70.7
1984 55.3 695 8.6 2003 25.5 10542 86.4
1985 53.7 858 10.2 2004 21.5 12336 99.5
1986 52.1 963 11.4 2005 19 14185 118.7
1987 50.5 1112 11.6 2006 17.2 16500 135.3
1988 48.9 1366 13.1 2007 15.3 20169 195.4
1989 47.3 1519 14.9 2008 14.9 23708 270.6
1990 45.7 1644 16.4 2009 13.8 25608 360.8
1991 50.2 1893 17.6 2010 13.1 30015 427.5
1992 46.7 2311 19.5 2011 12.1 35198 554
1993 43.6 2998 23 2012 10.3 38459 622.7
1994 39.9 4044 28.5 2013 9.5 41908 701.5
1995 36.4 5046 32 2014 8.9 46629 773.4
1996 36 5846 37.7 ? ? ? ?

Table 2. Date of IMR (%), GDP per capita (yuan) and GHE per capita (yuan) in China in 1978-2014.

Staging of data

IMR and GDP per capita of 1952-2014 were grouped by different stages according to the time order. The last year of the previous stage was used as the starting point of the next stage. 1952-1955 was the first stage, with 1955-1960 as the second stage, and so on. 63 years were divided into 13 stages. The GHE data in 1952-1977 were lacked, so the grouping started from 1980-1985, and 35 years were divided into 7 stages. According to the staged grouping, the bivariate Pearson’s analysis was performed on IMR with GDP per capita, IMR with GHE per capita, and GDP per capita with GHE per capita in each stage, respectively. According to the results of the correlation analysis, the turning point for effect of GDP per capita to IMR was sought.

IMRs in 1, 2, 3... n-1, n year were set as y1, y2, y3... yn-1, yn, respectively. The average growth rate was calculated as (yn-y1)/( n-1), which reflected the number of average annual growth. The average development speed was calculated as n-1 √yn/y1, which represented the average development and annual change in a long period. The average growth rate was calculated by average development rate subtracting 1, which represented the average growth and annual change in a long period. The positive value indicated average rate of rise, and the negative value indicated average rate of decline. The average levels of GDP per capita and GHE per capita were calculated as the same as before.

Statistical analysis

IMR, GDP per capita and GHE per capita were calculated in the Excel worksheet. The bivariate Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed using the SPSS 17.0 statistical software. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. If there was statistical significance, the degree of correlation was judged according to the size of |r|. |r| ≥ 0.95, 0.95>|r| ≥ 0.8, 0.8>|r| ≥ 0.5, 0.5>|r| ≥ 0.3 and |r|<0.3 presented significant, high, moderate, low and no correlation, respectively.

Results

Correlation among GDP per capita, GHE per capita and IMR

In the 4 stages from 1952 to 1970, there was no correlation between GDP per capita and IMR (r=-0.393, p=0.096). In the 9 stages of 1970-2014, there was negative correlation between GDP per capita and IMR in the 8 stages (1980-1985 was excepted). In 1970-2014, a high degree of negative correlation between GDP per capita and IMR (r=-0.827, p=0.000). In 1980-1985, there was no correlation between GHE per capita and IMR. In 6 stages in 1985-2014, GHE per capita and IMR were significantly or highly negative correlation. In 1985-2014, there was moderate negative correlation (r=-0.795, p=0.000) between them. In 7 stages in 1980-2014, GDP per capita and GHE per capita were significantly positively correlated. In 1978-2014, they had a significantly positive correlation (r=0.997, p=0.000) (Table 3).

Stage mean value IMR and GDP per capita IMR and GHE per capita GDP per capita and GHE per capita
IMR GDP per capita GHE per capita r p r p r p
1952-1955 155.05 138.75   -0.908 0.092        
1955-1960 166.1 186.33   0.577 0.231        
1960-1965 148.22 200.83   0.146 0.782        
1965-1970 90.65 245.67   -0.374 0.465        
1970-1975 74.82 301.67   -0.98 0.001*        
1975-1980 61.7 375.17   -0.942 0.005*        
1980-1985 56.73 603.17 7.4 -0.756 0.082 -0.691 0.128 0.986 0.000*
1985-1990 49.7 1243.67 12.93 -0.993 0.000* -0.98 0.001* 0.977 0.001*
1990-1995 43.75 2989.33 22.83 -0.938 0.006* -0.936 0.006* 0.998 0.000*
1995-2000 34.03 6520.83 44.4 -0.919 0.010* -0.907 0.012* 0.996 0.000*
2000-2005 26.23 10490.17 82.33 -0.992 0.000* -0.993 0.000* 0.997 0.000*
2005-2010 15.55 21697.5 251.38 -0.965 0.002* -0.928 0.008* 0.984 0.000*
2010-2014 10.78 38441.8 615.82 -0.974 0.005* -0.98 0.003* 0.996 0.000*

Table 3. Correlation among of IMR, GDP per capita and GHE per capita in China at different stages in 1952-2014.

Turning point for effect of GDP per capita to decline of IMR

In 1970-1975, GDP per capita and IMR showed a negative correlation for the first time, which was the initial relevant turning period. In 1970-2014, GDP per capita increased by 46353 yuan, and IMR descended by 73.3%. For GDP per capita increase by 100 yuan, the IMR descended by 0.16%. Although in 1985-1990 the negative correlation firstly appeared between GEH per capita and IMR, due to lack of complete and systematic data of GHE per capita, it was difficult to accurately determine whether there was an “initial relevant turning period” before the 1985-1990 stage. In 1985-2014, GDP per capita increased by 763.4 yuan, and IMR descended by 44.75‰. With GDP per capita increasing by 100 yuan, the IMR descended by 5.86‰. When another turning point appeared, at which the relevant relationship of GDP per capita increase with IMR decrease transferred to no correlation, needed to be further dynamically observed.

Comparison of the staged average development indexes

With different stages, IMR generally presented a downward trend. The average decrease was 2.50%, with the average growth rate of 95.41% and the average decline rate of 4.59%. However, in 1955-1965, the IMR fluctuated significantly. In the first 5 years, the average increase of IMR increased significantly. In the following 5 years, it decreased significantly. In other stages, the absolute amount of the average decrease decreased gradually. The GDP per capita showed an upward trend in general. In 1952-2014, the average growth of GDP per capita was 750.16 yuan, with average rate of 110.11% and average growth rate of 10.11%. In 1960-1965, the average growth of GDP per capita showed a downward trend. In each of the following stages, the average growth of GDP per capita showed a rising year by year. The GHE per capita showed an upward trend in general. In 1978-2014, the average growth of GHE per capita was 21.38 yuan, with average development rate of 115.60% and average growth rate of 15.60%. In each stage, the average increase amount of GHE per capita increased year by year. In 5 of 7 stages, the average growth rate was higher than the GDP per capita. In 1980-1995, the average growth rate of GDP per capita was 17.26%, the average growth rate of GHE per capita was 12.80%, and the decline rate of IMR was 2.82%. In 1995-2014, the average growth rate of GDP per capita was 12.42%, the average growth rate of GHE per capita was 18.25%, and the decline rate of IMR was 7.15% (Table 4 and Figure 1).

Stage IMR GDP per capita GHE per capita
Average growth Average development rate Average growth rate Average growth Average development rate Average growth rate Average growth Average development rate Average growth rate
1952-1955 -5.97 96.22 -3.78 10.33 108.02 8.02      
1955-1960 27.56 114.2 14.2 13.6 107.76 7.76      
1960-1965 -36.88 81.09 -18.91 4.4 101.94 1.94      
1965-1970 -3.48 96.33 -3.77 7.2 102.83 2.83      
1970-1975 -2.88 96.22 -3.78 10.6 103.58 3.58      
1975-1980 -2.38 96.21 -3.79 26.85 107.08 7.08      
1980-1985 -0.44 99.2 -0.8 78.91 113.11 13.11 0.99 114.15 14.15
1985-1990 -1.6 96.82 -3.18 157.33 113.9 13.9 1.24 109.98 9.98
1990-1995 -1.86 95.55 -4.45 680.25 125.14 25.14 3.12 114.3 14.3
1995-2000 -0.84 97.58 -2.42 562.39 109.26 9.26 4.8 111.85 11.85
2000-2005 -2.64 89.99 -10.01 1265.54 112.54 12.54 12.55 116.23 16.23
2005-2010 -1.18 92.83 -7.17 3165.94 116.17 16.17 61.75 129.2 29.2
2010-2014 -1.05 90.79 -9.21 4153.49 111.64 11.64 86.48 115.98 15.98

Table 4. Comparison of the average development level in IMR, per capita GDP and per capita GHE in China.

biomedres-gross-domestic-health

Figure 1 : Change of average growth rate in gross domestic product per capita, government health expenditure per capita and infant mortality rate with different stages.

Discussion

Results of this study indicated that, the negative correlation between per capita GDP and IMR did not always exist. During early years of the new nation of China, the IMR was as high as 200%. In 1960-1965, the decline rate of IMR was accelerated after the rebound. The main reason was that, during the three years of natural disasters, the IMR rebounded. After the famine was corrected, the IMR dropped to normal levels. It dropped to 82.2% in 1970. There was no correlation between per capita GDP and IMR in the 4 stages of 1952-1970. This indicated that China had made remarkable achievement in making IMR fallen significantly. Before liberation of China, the people are very destitute. During the early years after liberation, China was still very poor. However, with the gradual stability of the social order, the people's nutrition and health status had been improved after the basic life was gradually guaranteed. The country promoted the popularization of laws on new midwifery, birth control and vaccination, and gradually established a service system of MCH. Particularly, the barefoot doctors were popularized in rural areas, and the IMR decreased rapidly [14]. Foreign research showed that, during the Iraq war, the IMR rebounded [15]. After the end of the war, the IMR rapidly declined. In 1989-2012, the implementation of the peace agreement was linked to the mortality rate of new-borns, infants and children below 5 years old in 73 armed conflict countries in the world. The continued armed conflict led to large-scale migration of population, destruction of the economic, medical and human infrastructure, which hindered the improvement of children's survival [4].

China's achievements are not only the result of the founding of the new China, but also the implementation of national support policy. In the beginning of the last century, the IMR and economic growth began to show a negative correlation, and the average growth rate of per capita GDP was only 3.58%. The economic growth not only played a role in the decline of infant mortality, but also fully explained the key synergic effect of “support-led” national policy in the same period. With the deepening of reform and opening up and the rapid economic growth, this kind of negative correlation still existed, excepting 1980-1985 years. This was related to the fluctuation of IMR in the late 70s and early 80s, which might be due to the fact that, the children death reporting system had not been established. The IMR after reconstruction and adjustment was still lower than the actual level at that time. Perhaps a decline in IMR was not with a smooth and uniform decline, which was due to an annual fluctuation in the course of the decline in IMR. Whether this role would continue to exist in the future? It is speculated that, when the IMR continued at a low level [16], its cause was a difficult problem to be solved in medical science, and the economic growth would be difficult to play a significant role in the decline of IMR. So this kind of negative relationship would not exist. After entering the initial relevant turning period, the orderly and appropriately increased GHE and timely regulating prevention and control strategies could promote the decline in IMR. Social development, economic growth, material wealth, income growth and improvement of living conditions help to improve the quality of life and health conditions. At the same time, the economic development is the foundation of national health investment. It can promote the progress of medical science, make the health care possible, and create conditions for the prevention and control of the disease and promotion of health. In addition, with the development of the social economy and the popularization of education, the population health and health care awareness have been continuously strengthened. As a result, the economic growth plays an indirect role in the decline of IMR.

Results of this study also showed that, in 1985-2014, the per capita GHE and IMR had a negative correlation. The health investment can be improved the level of health care service and promote the health quality. It also has indirect effect on the IMR. The effect of GDP per capita and GHE per capita on IMR can exist independently, and also can synergistically exist. The results showed that, after entering the initial relevant turning period, when the GHE per capita increased with 100 yuan, the effect of GHE per capita on IMR was significantly higher than that of GDP per capita. When the average growth speed of GHE per capita was faster than the average GDP per capita, the decline of IMR was significantly accelerated. This indicated that, the effect of GHE per capita on IMR was more significant and more direct than that of GDP per capita. 1990-1995 years were the fastest growing stage for GDP per capita growth. At this time, the average growth rate of GHE per capita was lower than the GDP per capita, and the phenomenon of the fastest decline of IMR did not appear in the same period. This showed that, the impact of economic growth on IMR had a certain lag. In 2000-2005, the decline rate of IMR increased once again. This might be caused by the lag of economic growth, and might be related to that the growth rate of GHE per capita was higher than that of GDP per capita. The “growth priming” effect of economic factors can affect the IMR. If the economic growth is not significant, the government should increase investment in health, which can also affect the IMR. In fact, this is also the result of national policy (supportled).

In the early ten years of reform and opening up, the prototype of the framework system of maternal and child health policy in China was established. In 1990s, the policy of maternal and child health was fully improved. Since 21st century, the policy of maternal and child health developed to the equalization of the direction of the people. In following 30 years, this policy transferred from the prevention and treatment of disease to the improvement of the quality of life. The “support-led” is the government's active function. Once the “support-led” effect is lost, and the measure of prevention and control to infant mortality carry out unsuccessfully, the IMR world not decline or even rebound. The “growth-mediated” has the amplification effect on economic growth, and the effect on IMR is indirect and passive. The only way to change the passive to active role is to increase the health investment. Columbia government actualizes the fiscal decentralization, decentralizes the health care spending, and improves the medical insurance system, which has reduced the IMR [17]. Uganda government implements a path of decentralization, and increases the supply of public goods such as health services, which has promoted the decline in infant IMR [18].

Under the situation of social progress and sustainable economic growth, outstripping economic growth results, expanding maternal and child health investment, strengthening the national policy support, implementing the integrated project to reduce the mortality rate, and setting up a the operating mechanism of “surpass-growth and support” will benefit children's health of live and quality of life. In 1952-1970, there was no correlation between per capita GDP and IMR. The decline of IMR was the result of “Support-led”. In 1980-1995, the growth rate of per capita GHE was lower than the growth rate of per capita GDP. The decline of IMR was the result of the synergy between “Support-led” and “growth-mediated”. In 1995-2014, per capita GDP showed a negative correlation with IMR. Average growth rate of per capita GHE was faster than the average growth rate of per capita GDP. So the decline of IMR was the result of “surpassgrowth and support”. The main purpose of analysing the successful types of the IMR decline was to summarize the successful experience, establish the active mechanism, construct the new mode of “surpass-growth and support” to reduce the IMR, and shorten the process of the decline in IMR.

The “surpass-growth and support” is the inevitable requirement of the new model. On the one hand, it is required to closely link to the national development strategy, change the mode of economic growth, cultivate new economic growth point, and explore the sustainable development mode to promote a healthy economic growth. On the other hand, it should be based on the benefit of the people's livelihood, and it is required to increase the health investment, maintain the health investment growth rate. The health work should be vigorously implemented, and the effectiveness of the protection of people's health should be fully developed.

References