Biomedical Research

Research Article - Biomedical Research (2018) Volume 29, Issue 17

Association of physical performance tests with frailty indicators and oxidative stress markers in a sample of a community-dwelling elderly population

Levy Munguia1, Vannia Solis1, Eduardo Meaney1, Israel Ramirez-Sanchez1, Francisco Villarreal2, Javier Perez-Duran1, Ivan Rubio-Gayosso1, Alicia Ortiz3, Guillermo Ceballos1# and Nayelli Najera1*#

1Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico

2School of Medicine, UCSD, USA

3Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico

#These authors have equally contributed to this study

*Corresponding Author:
Nayelli Najera
Escuela Superior de Medicina
Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Mexico

Accepted date: September 18, 2018

Visit for more related articles at Biomedical Research

Abstract

Aim: Frailty is a syndrome that commonly affects the elderly population and is characterized by physical, mental and metabolic decline, increasing the risk for disability and death. The aim of this study was to study the relationship amongst the performance in 6 min walk distance, 2-min step, sit-up, and up and go tests with frailty and its relationship with select, pre-identified factors in a communitydwelling elderly Mexican population.

Methods: The study comprised 170 individuals between 65-90 y old from 5 community centres in Mexico City. Frailty was defined using the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) criteria. A set of variables were used to explore associations between mobility and frailty, health conditions, and quality of life.

Results: Mean age of participants was 72.6 ± 6.5 y, 82.3% of which were women. The prevalence of frailty was 25.9% (n=44). Frailty was more frequent in women, in persons aged 80 y and over as well as in those demonstrating low performance in the 2-min step, sit-up, and up and go tests. Lipoperoxidation measured as malondialdehyde (MDA) and carbonyl blood concentrations, as markers of oxidative stress, were significantly elevated in frail vs. non-frail subjects

Conclusion: Frailty is a common pathology in a sample of the elderly community in Mexico. It is associated to low physical performance, quality of life, body composition and metabolic parameters and high oxidative stress.

Keywords

Elderly, Frailty, Fried frailty phenotype, Oxidative stress, Physical performance

Introduction

The demographic segment of subjects aged 65 y old or more in Mexico represents currently~9% of the country’s population. This proportion has increased rapidly over the last few decades, as a result of both; a decrease in birth rate and a longer life expectancy [1]. Ageing is frequently associated with the development of multiple morbid conditions as; decreased physical and mental abilities, dependence and low quality of life. Age-related physical and mental deficiencies constitute a heavy burden for the elders, their families and the public health care systems [2]. The expanded incidence and prevalence of frailty, due to the demographic ageing of the population is a major concern everywhere [3].

Although the concept has evolved, the most accepted definition of frailty is the one proposed by Fried [4] that comprises five criteria: weight loss without an intentional weight-losing regime, weakness, exhaustion or fatigue, slow walking speed and low physical activity. Frailty leads to an increased risk for falls, disability, hospitalizations and mortality [4]. The prevalence of frailty in Latin America and the Caribbean ranges from 7.7%-42.6% [5]. In Mexico, several studies report prevalence of 14.1% to 37.2%, ranking among the continent's highest [6].

Numerous studies have described the association of decrease of both handgrip strength and physical performance tests, with functional disability and mortality [7-9]. The use of specific tests for physical capacity evaluation in elderly individuals is helpful to determine which patients are most at risk of accelerated multi-organ decline [10]. According to the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey, 26.9% of the elderly have some degree of functional limitation and despite the government's efforts to include older people in social programs; ~40% do not receive medical attention [11].

Recent evidence demonstrates that oxidative stress plays an important role in activating signaling pathways involved in muscle wasting and loss of metabolic resiliency, which may contribute to frailty [12]. It has been shown that reactive oxygen species levels among the elderly are increased, leading to oxidative damage to biomolecules including carbohydrates, lipid, proteins and DNA [13].

The aim of this study was to establish the association of physical mobility, frailty, cardiovascular risk biomarkers and oxidative stress markers in a sample of community-dwelling elders' population in Mexico City.

Methods

The study was conducted between October and December 2016. An invitation to participate was posted in five community centres located in Mexico City. The inclusion criteria were: community-dwelling healthy subjects over the age of 65 y that were mobile (capable of move without aid). Non-inclusion criteria include; habitual consumption of antioxidant supplements, benzodiazepines, protein supplements and active chronic infections or malignancies. Volunteers signed informed consent indicating their agreement to participate including permit to publish the obtained results. The ethics and research committee of Escuela Superior de Medicina of the Instituto Politecnico Nacional approved this study. The following data were collected for demographic purposes and grouped in categories: anthropometry, medical history and functional assessment.

Study variables

Classification of frailty: We considered the 5-criteria proposed by Fried frailty criteria (FFP) that defines frailty by the presence of three or more of the following: unintentional weight loss, weakness, self-reported exhaustion or fatigue, slow walking speed and low physical activity. Slowness was considered if the individual was in the lower 20% of its group for sex, based on the time to perform the up and go test. Weakness was defined as maximum grip strength of ≤ 30 kg for men and ≤ 20 kg for women. Exhaustion/fatigue was considered if the subject experienced severe tiredness. Low physical activity was defined when the subject did not perform regular exercise. Weight loss was diagnosed when the subject reported unintentional weight loss of 5 kg or more in the previous 2 y.

Anthropometric measures

Anthropometric variables were body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference and body composition. Measures were obtained with the subject barefooted and lightly dressed. Height was measured with a wall-stadiometer. Body muscle mass, visceral fat mass and body fat percent were obtained using a bioelectrical impedance method by Omron HBF-516 apparatus. The abdominal circumference (waist) was measured with a fiber-glass metric tape, at the mid-point between the top of the hip bone and the lowest rib of each subject at the end of expiration.

Functional assessment

Six-minute walk test: Subjects were instructed to walk at their normal gait pace during 6 min, in a straight indoor corridor of 30 m of length, with a flat and hard surface covered by squared tiles measuring 33 × 33 cm. The estimation of the walked distance was done taking into account those markers and using a flexible retracting tape measure to include the inter-tile distance.

Two-minute step in place test: Subjects in a standing up straight position, started marching in place during two minutes, raising each knee as many times as possible.

Sit-up test: Subjects go up and sit down as quickly as possible during a 30 s period, keeping their arms folded across the chest.

Up and go test: Subjects seated back in an arm chair, on the word “go” they got up and walked through a 3-meter line on the floor, turned around and walked back to the chair and sat down. Time was recorded by stopwatch.

Handgrip strength

Handgrip strength was determined using a handgrip dynamometer, measuring the intensity of three consecutive grips done with the dominant hand. The highest value was considered as the patient's muscle strength.

Metabolic status

After a fasting phase of 12 h, a venous blood sample was taken to determine glycemia and a lipid profile (total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), cholesterol of high-density lipoproteins (HDL-c) and cholesterol of low-density lipoproteins (LDL-c)). The index TG/HDL reflecting coronary risk [14] and insulin resistance [15] was also estimated.

Oxidative stress biomarkers

Lipid oxidation was measured using the malondialdehyde (MDA) assay. In this reaction, a lipid peroxidation product is produced with 1-methyl-2-phenylindole which in the presence of MDA produces a color detected spectrophotometrically at 586 nm. Protein carbonylation was measured using an assay for detection of carbonyl groups that relies on 2, 4- dinitrophenylhydrazine as a substrate. The reaction leads to the formation of a stable 2, 4-dinitrophenyl hydrazone product, which is evaluated spectrophotometrically at 375 nm.

Quality of life

For the assessment of daily activities, performance and quality of life perception, we used the EuroQuality of Life 5D instrument (EQ-5D) that consists of a visual analog scale (VAS) and a descriptive system covering 5 items (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression) in a 0-100 scale [16].

Statistical analyses

Data are reported as mean ± SD. Analysis was performed with Graph Pad Prism V7.0 and SPSS V24. Statistical significance was considered when p-value<0.05. To assess the association of anthropometric, medical and performance factors with frailty, a bivariate analysis was performed using a Fisher’s test for categorical variables. A Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables stratified by sex. Adjusted multiple logistic regression models were fitted including all the covariates (age, sex, marital status, years in school, smoking status, number of medications and chronic diseases and performance tests) reporting odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis of co-variances (MANCOVA) was used as necessary, controlling for confounders. All data analysis was approved by an expert statistician.

Results

Analysis included 170 participants aged 65 y and over from a total of 900 members of five communities centres in Mexico City. The distribution of general variables is shown in Table S1. Mean age was 72.6 ± 6.5 (range: 65-90), 82.3% of whom were women (140/170).

The majority of the study participants were overweight (71.1%), with increased waist circumference (81.2%) and elevated body fat percentage (77%). Regarding the physical performance battery test, there were no significant differences between genders. The mean results (Table S2) of these tests were as follows: In the 6 min walk test (381.8 ± 82.1 meters), in the 2 min step in place test (159.2 ± 35.3 repetitions), in the sit-up test (13.8 ± 3.4 repetitions), in the up and go test (8.6 ± 2.2 seconds) and handgrip strength (17.2 ± 4.1 kg).

More men reported moderate problems than women in mobility (Table S3) (40% vs. 11.4%, P=0.0005). Men reported more problems vs. women in the usual activities category (40% vs. 14.3%, P=0.003), and also more moderate pain/discomfort vs. women (20% vs. 6.4%, P=0.02). Men reported more anxiety vs. women (60% vs. 14.3%, P<0.0001). However test results showed a better quality of life score in men (78 vs. 76, P=0.048).

Frailty

The most common component of the FFP found in women (Table S4) was exhaustion with 55.7% (n=78), while in men it was low physical activity, with a frequency of 33.3% (n=10). The prevalence of FFP was 25.9% (n=44), without difference between genders (27.9% women vs. 16.7% men, P=0.25). The peak of prevalence of frailty and its components (Figure 1A) is found from the age of 81 y, with the most affected categories being weight loss, slowness and low physical performance.

biomedres-Fried-frailty

Figure 1: (A) Prevalence of Fried frailty phenotype (FFP) criteria (% of population ages 65-90) in a sample of elder Mexican population. Data shows an age-dependent increase in slowness, weakness and exhaustion resulting in an increase in frailty; (B) Lipid peroxidation plasma levels measured using the malondialdehyde (MDA) assay. There is a statistical difference (p=0.01) in MDA concentration between subjects with frailty and those no frail. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were determined using “t”- test; (C) Protein carbonylation plasma levels measured using 2, 4- dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) as a substrate. There is a statistical difference (p=0.0001) in carbonyls concentration between subjects with frailty and those no frail. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were determined using “t”-test.

Table 1 shows blood based metabolic parameters including; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), total cholesterol and triglycerides, as well as glucose concentration. No association was found between frailty and metabolic profile. However, frail subjects had higher plasma lipid peroxidation vs. non-frail subjects (P<0.01) (Figure 1B). As noted in Table 2, higher lipid peroxidation levels were associated with increased odds ratios (OR) of frailty, for men (OR 4.89, 95% CI 0.61-31.3) and for women (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.53-8.5). Frail subjects also had higher levels of protein carbonylation vs. non-frail subjects (P<0.0001) (Figure 1C). Higher carbonylation levels were associated with increased odds of frailty, for men (OR 4.3, 95% CI 0.52-56.5) and for women (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.44-6.6) (Table 2).

Variable No frail Frail p value
n=126 n=44
Glucose (mg/dL) 98.8 ± 10.1 95 ± 14.3 0.12
TC (mg/dL) 200.6 ± 32.5 190.6 ± 30.9 0.44
TG (mg/dL) 155.8 ± 18.3 153.7 ± 18.4 0.07
C-HDL (mg/dL) 42.1 ± 4.1 43.4 ± 6.5 0.08
C-LDL (mg/dL) 127.9 ± 35.3 121 ± 32.9 0.36
TG/HDL (Index) 4.6 ± 1.2 3.9 ± 1.1 0.13
Lipid peroxidation (nm/ml) 8.3 ± 0.1 9.1 ± 0.3 0.01
Protein carbonyls (nm/ml) 59.3 ± 0.6 64.5 ± 0.8 <0.0001

Table 1. Metabolic variables.

Men Women
n (%) frail Univariate odds ratios (95% CI) for frailty n (%) frail Univariate odds ratios (95% CI) for frailty
Age (y) <80 3 (14.3) 1.71 (0.26-9.75) 22 (22) 2.62 (1.15-5.9)
>80 2 (22.2) 17 (42.5)
Years in school ≤ 9 3 (27.3) 3.18 (0.53-19.87) 31 (28.4) 1.14 (0.48-2.76)
>9 2 (15.8) 8 (25.8)
Smoking status Formerly 3 (16.7) 1.2 (0.19-6.7) 27 (27) 0.67 (0.27-1.67)
Currently 2 (20) 7 (20)
Number of medications 1-3 3 (17.6) 1.16 (0.18-6.7) 22 (22) 2.62 (1.15-5.9)
4-5 2 (20) 17 (42.5)
Number of chronic diseases 1-2 3 (18.8) 0.72 (0.11-4.1) 13 (15.9) 4.31 (2-9.5)
3-4 2 (14.3) 26 (44.8)
BMI (kg/m2) Normal 2 (22.2) 0.58 (0.1-3.9) 11 (27.5) 1.03 (0.45-2.22)
OW/Ob 3 (14.3) 28 (28)
Waist (cm) Normal 1 (8.3) 3.1 (0.38-41.5) 3 (15) 2.4 (0.7-8.2)
Increased 4 (22.2) 36 (30)
Body muscle mass (%) Low 2 (16.7) 1 (0.15-5.6) 25 (30.8) 1.43 (0.69-2.98)
Normal 3 (16.7) 14 (23.7)
Body fat mass (%) <25/<36 2 (28.6) 0.38 (0.06-2.65) 12 (37.5) 0.56 (0.25-1.26)
>25/>36 3 (13) 27 (25)
Visceral fat mass (%) Normal 2 (20) 0.7 (0.12-4.64) 24 (40) 0.35 (0.17-0.72)
High 3 (15) 15 (18.8)
Lipid peroxidation (nmol) >8.3 2 (40) 4.89 (0.61-31.3) 15 (50) 3.5 (1.53-8.5)
<8.3 3 (12) 24 (21.8)
Protein carbonyls (nmol/mg) >59.3 4 (25) 4.3 (0.52-56.5) 26 (39.4) 3.05 (1.44-6.6)
<59.3 1 (7.1) 13 (17.6)

Table 2. Univariate associations between frailty and the clinical, anthropometric, characteristics.

Univariate analysis shows in women, an association between frailty and age 80 and over (Table 2), under multiple medications, affected by several comorbidities and increased waist circumference. For men, frailty was associated to age over 80 and to a low education level and increased waist circumference.

The association of physical performance battery tests and quality of life with frailty is shown in Table 3. Men showed increased odds of frailty with low performance in the 6-min walk (OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.11-15.1), the 2-min step test (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.29-10.2) and mobility (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.27-30), usual activities (OR 3.7, 95% CI 0.45-48), pain (OR 10.3, 95% CI 1.17-131) and quality of life (OR 4.75, 95% CI 0.77-29.8). Women showed increased odds of frailty with low performance in the 2-min step test (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.5-6.5), the sit-up test (OR 11.2, 95% CI 3.1-39.7), the handgrip strength test (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.6-7.1) and the items of mobility (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.7), usual activities (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.28-6.4), pain (OR 7.2, 95% CI 3.2-15.4), anxiety (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.4-8) and quality of life (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.15-5.2).

Men Women
n (%) frail Univariate odds ratios (95% CI) for frailty n (%) frail Univariate odds ratios (95% CI) for frailty
6-min walk test (m) <300 1 (25) 1.83 (0.11-15.1) 34 (28.8) 1.37 (0.49- 3.6)
>300 4 (15.4) 5 (22.7)
2-min step test (n) <150 3 (20) 1.63 (0.29-10.2) 24 (41.4) 3.15 (1.5-6.5)
>150 2 (13.3) 15 (18.3)
Sit-up test (n) <10 3 (16.7) 1 (0.18-6.4) 9 (75) 11.2 (3.1-39.7)
>10 2 (16.7) 27 (21.1)
Up and go test (s) <10 3 (15) 1 (0.18-6.4) 9 (75) 10.7 (3-37.9)
>10 2 (20) 28 (21.9)
Handgrip strength (kg) <15 3 (12) 0.28 (0.05-2.1) 25 (41.7) 3.36 (1.6-7.1)
>15 2 (33.3) 14 (17.5)
Mobility (n) Problems 4 (20) 2.25 (0.27-30) 23 (39.7) 2.7 (1.3-5.7)
No problems 1 (10) 16 (19.5)
Self-care (n) Problems 2 (18.2) 1.18 (0.18-6.68) 15 (30) 1.18 (0.6-2.5)
No problems 3 (15.8) 24 (26.7)
Usual activities (n) Problems 4 (23.5) 3.7 (0.45-48) 15 (45.4) 2.88 (1.28-6.4)
No problems 1 (7.7) 24 (22.4)
Pain (n) Problems 4 (36.4) 10.3 (1.17-131) 27 (52.9) 7.2 (3.2-15.4)
No problems 1 (5.3) 12 (13.5)
Anxiety (n) Problems 3 (13.7) 0.47 (0.08-3.2) 14 (50) 3.5 (1.4-8)
No problems 2 (25) 25 (22.3)
QoL VAS (n) <70 3 (33.3) 4.75 (0.77-29.8) 21 (38.9) 2.4 (1.15-5.2)
>70 2 (9.5) 18 (20.9)

Table 3. Univariate associations between frailty and physical performance health related quality of life characteristics and oxidative markers.

The association (MANCOVA analysis) between frailty, anthropometric, oxidative stress and performance variables, controlled for confounders (age and sex) is reported in Table 4. We identified correlations between scholarship, muscle and body fat percentage, waist circumference, self-perception of mobility and usual activities as well as with elevated lipid peroxidation and protein carbonylation levels.

F p
Scholarship 11.22 0.001
Comorbidities 6.38 0.01
Waist circumference 6.31 0.01
Muscle mass 5.16 0.024
Total fat mass 9.17 0.003
Mobility 19.57 <0.0001
Usual activities 4.95 0.027
Lipid peroxidation 5.34 0.025
Protein carbonyls 6.22 0.01

Table 4. Correlation (MANCOVA) between frailty and related factors adjusted for age and sex.

Discussion

This study is to our knowledge, the first to simultaneously assess the influence of body composition, social, clinical, quality of life, metabolic and oxidative stress parameters and physical performance in a community-dwelling elderly population. Results obtained pose the possibility of associate biomarkers of oxidative stress with physical tests to identify early stages of frailty in the elderly.

The frequency of frailty in this sample was~25.9% in persons over 65 y, which is consistent with other previous studies in Mexico [6] and in larger studies developed in other countries [5]. In our study, frailty was more frequent in women (27.9% women vs. 16.7% men). This gender difference is accentuated in women over the age of 80 y.

As anticipated, the frequency of frailty in this study increased with age. Persons>80 y increase their odd of frailty, resulting in twice the incidence vs. those aged<80 y.

On the other hand, previous studies have reported that walking speed is predictive of frailty and adverse outcomes [17] and that a poor performance in the 6 and 2 min tests increases the odds risk of frailty [18]. In this study we detected an association between both; the sit up test and the up and go test with frailty.

It has been reported an association between frailty and markers of inflammation and oxidative stress [19]. Carbonylation is associated with the accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) [20], which can activate the proinflammatory AGE receptors (RAGE)

We report here that indicators of oxidative stress (protein carbonylation and lipid peroxidation) significantly relate with frailty. Oxidative stress can activate cell apoptotic pathways and promote a decline in mitochondrial bioenergetics amongst many other detrimental effects [12]. The activation of these events by oxidative stress may explain detrimental effects on skeletal muscle that leads to loss of mass and strength, reducing functional independence and thereby promoting frailty [21]. Indeed, increased protein carbonylation has been associated with decreased handgrip strength [22]. Thus, a redox imbalance due to ageing can accentuate a decrease in muscle strength and mobility leading to the further development of weakness and slowness [23].

A possible link between oxidative stress and frailty was previously evaluated and the results failed to evidence a clear association [24]. In contrast our findings suggest that increased levels of protein carbonylation and lipid peroxidation associate to low physical performance as assessed by the battery of frailty tests used, in concordance with self-reported low physical performance as well as muscle and fat mass imbalance.

Our results are in agreement with the suggestion of the association oxidative stress and inflammation as pathways to frailty [25] and with the reported results of the ESTHER Cohort Study [26] suggesting and association of oxidative stress and CRP in the development of frailty, with reports suggesting association of altered redox balance [27], oxidative stress and cognitive decline [28] and frailty [28,29]. Oxidative stress also is related to frailty in subjects with Alzheimer disease suggesting a broader effect in the pathologies related to these alterations in the elderly [30].

Conclusion

Results reported herein evidence a strong association among physical performance, quality of life, metabolic and oxidative stress parameters in a community-dwelling elderly population. These results can be the base for future implementation of interventional studies to decrease frailty in the elderly with an integrated approach.

Acknowledgment

Funding

CONACyT 253769 to GC and NIHDK98717 & AG47326 to FV; FV and GC are stockholders of Cardero Therapeutics; all rest authors declare no interest conflict. Funding was used only to research purposes.

References