Journal of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Short Communication - Journal of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (2022) Volume 6, Issue 1

Types of nanomaterials role in plant pathogen, properties of nano materials.

Yideng Jiang*

Department of Pathophysiology, Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China

*Corresponding Author:
Yideng Jiang
Department of Pathophysiology
Ningxia Medical University
Ningxia, China

Received: 30-Dec-2021, Manuscript No. AABIB-22-54520; Editor assigned: 01-Jan-2022, Pre QC No. AABIB-22-54520 (PQ); Reviewed: 15-Jan-2022, QC No. AABIB-22-54520; Revised: 20-Jan-2022; AABIB-22-54520 (R); Published: 27-Jan-2022, DOI: 10.35841/aabib-6.1.105

Citation: Yideng Jiang. Types of nanomaterials role in plant pathogen, properties of nano materials. J Biomed Imag Bioeng. 2022;4(1):7.105

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering


The recognizable proof and evaluation of plant pathogens within the early stages of contamination play an critical part to guarantee nourishment security and diminish edit misfortune. Over the past a long time, progresses in nanomaterials inquire about have permitted the improvement of novel plant infection (bio)sensors with tall affectability and specificity. In this survey, we address the utilize of diverse 0D, 1D, 2D and 3D nanomaterials for planning changed plant malady (bio) sensors. Particularly, the engaging highlights of nanomaterials, counting tall surface area/volume proportion, tunable physical-chemical properties and capability to join biomolecules, are talked about, whereas illustrative cases on how they can be connected to move forward the execution of electrical, electrochemical, optical, gravimetric and warm sensors are displayed. At last, future patterns, challenges and openings on the utilize of such nanomaterial-based (bio)sensors for onsite and assist plant pathogen discovery are too displayed.


Nanotechnology, Nanomaterials, Chemical sensors, Biosensors, Plant disease, Pathogens, Agriculture


The got to bolster the world's developing population is putting weight on horticulture exercises in arrange to extend efficiency combined to nourishment security. In this heading, intrusive plant pathogens, such as infections, organisms, and microscopic organisms, are as a rule undesirable impactful specialists that can possibly cause different plant infections and diminish edit efficiency [1]. For occurrence, agreeing to FAO, plant maladies fetched around $220 billion for the worldwide economy. In this manner, plant pathogens and/or their impacts on the plants ought to be early identified/diagnosed for advance self-assured activities and less expensive measures. Right now, numerous plant pathogens are more often than not distinguished by exposed eyes based on leaf viewpoints and visual condition of a plant [2,3] .Such discovery in numerous cases happens when the plant illness is as of now in an progressed organize, making it troublesome to be remediated and cured. Depending on the sort of manor and resulting disease, early discovery is required and favored for assist agrochemical remediation . When pathogenic discovery is assessed by instrumented, a few well-known strategies are utilized, such as polymerase chain response (PCR) , enzyme-linked immunosorbent measure (ELISA), and other classic strategies like colony checking, fluorescence in situ hybridization (Angle) [4] and stream cytometric location (FCM) immunology-based strategy.

These highlights are basic within the plan of (bio) sensors for plant pathogen discovery, once this handle for the most part requires the evaluation of the target analyses at moo concentrations and in complex lattices. One-dimensional nanostructures primarily within the frame of nanotubes, nanowires, Nano rods, and Nano fibers have also been broadly investigated within the improvement of detecting stages, Nanotubes, for occurrence, comprises of round and hollow structures showing nanometer-sized distance across and length shifting from nanometers to centimeters, which can be inorganic (e.g., Pt, Co3O4, Fe2O3, SnO2, and TiO2), natural (e.g., carbon) or composite (e.g., ZnO/carbon). Two-dimensional nanomaterial’s speak to a course of sheet-like structures with thicknesses of a single layer or a number of nuclear layers and sidelong dimensions larger than 100 nm, coming to up a couple of micrometers and indeed bigger In later a long time, an extraordinary assortment of 2D nanostructures counting grapheme and its subordinates, move metal dichalcogenides (TMDs, e.g., MoS2, and WS2) move metal oxides (TMOs, e.g., MoO3, WO3, and MnO2) graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) , and metal carbides and carbonitrides (MXenes). Three-dimensional nanomaterial’s display all three self-assertive measurements higher than 100 nm and are included within the lesson of nanomaterial’s due to their progressive structures comprised by numerous courses of action of Nano sized materials such as bundles of Nano fibers, nanowires, and nanotubes, scatterings of nanoparticles as well as multinanolayers [5].

Nanotechnology has illustrated a awesome potential to improve the improvement and execution of changed (bio) sensors for plant illness checking and administration, as examined all through this audit. Key highlights of 0D, 1D, 2D and 3D nanomaterial’s such as tall surface region to volume proportion, capacity to join bio-recognition particles, and the plausibility of tuning particular properties are essential for planning tall execution (bio) sensing gadgets. Bioengineering propels combined with nanostructures speak to a step forward towards novel bio sensing models for plant infection location improvement, and ought to bring advancement and deployable gadgets towards horticulture development and maintainability. Other than, wearable plant sensors and procedures to straightforwardly print utilitarian circuits speak to promising points for end of the of on-site and real-time plant checking utilizing detecting innovations. Among the distinctive transduction components (to be specific, electrical, electrochemical, optical, gravimetric and warm ones) secured in this survey, more momentous comes about have been accomplished utilizing electrical and optical (bio) sensors empowered by nanotechnology. In any case, the transduction components that don't show major developments accomplished or made strides by nanotechnology so distant speak to openings to be addressed and investigated within the next years. Other than, considering long term viewpoints within the field of plant malady diagnostics, we highlight the intrigued in creating gadgets that offer movability, ease of location, real-time and assist in situ checking for expansive scale and on-field applications.


  1. Wang H, Wang Y, Hou X, et al. Bioelectronic nose based on single-stranded dna and single-walled carbon nanotube to identify a major plant volatile organic compound (p-ethylphenol) released by phytophthora cactorum infected strawberries. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(3):479.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Chang W, Liu W, Liu Y, et al. Colorimetric detection of nucleic acid sequences in plant pathogens based on CRISPR/Cas9 triggered signal amplification. Microchimica Acta. 2019;186(4):1-8.
  4. Indexed at ,Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Li Z, Paul R, Ba Tis T, et al. Non-invasive plant disease diagnostics enabled by smartphone-based fingerprinting of leaf volatiles. Nature Plants. 2019;5(8):856-66.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Qiu L, Shen Z, Wu ZS, et al. Discovery of the unique self-assembly behavior of terminal suckerscontained dsDNA onto GNP and novel “light-up” colorimetric assay of nucleic acids. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015; 64:292-99.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Ermini ML, Mariani S, Scarano S, et al. Bioanalytical approaches for the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms by surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;61:28-37.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App