Journal of Environmental Waste Management and Recycling

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44 1518081136

Short Communication - Journal of Environmental Waste Management and Recycling (2025) Volume 8, Issue 3

Thermochemical Conversion: Unlocking Energy from Biomass and Waste through Heat-Driven Processes

Nazl?can Tezer*

Istanbul University-Cerrahpa?a, Department of Environmental Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey

*Corresponding Author:
Nazl?can Tezer
Istanbul University-Cerrahpa?a, Department of Environmental Engineering, Turkey
E-mail: nzltezer@gmail.com

Received: : 03-May-2025, Manuscript No. AAEWMR- 25- 165793; Editor assigned: 05-May-2025, PreQC No. AAEWMR- 25-165793 (PQ); Reviewed: 11-May-2025, QC No. AAEWMR- 25-165793; Revised:25-May-2025, Manuscript No. AAEWMR- 25-165793 (R); Published: 31-May-2025, DOI:10.35841/10.35841/aaewmr-8.2.266

Citation: Citation: Tezer. N. Thermochemical Conversion: Unlocking Energy from Biomass and Waste through Heat-Driven Processes. 2025; 8(3):266

Abstract

  

Introduction

As the world shifts toward renewable energy and sustainable waste management, thermochemical conversion has emerged as a vital process for converting organic materials— such as biomass, agricultural residues, and municipal solid waste—into usable forms of energy and valuable products. This method utilizes high temperatures and controlled environments to break down carbon-rich feedstocks into gases, oils, and char. Thermochemical conversion not only provides a pathway to clean fuels and chemicals but also plays a critical role in reducing waste volumes and greenhouse gas emissions. By leveraging heat instead of biological means, this approach offers faster and more versatile conversion technologies suited for large-scale applications. Thermochemical conversion refers to a set of high-temperature processes that decompose organic materials through chemical reactions involving heat, and often limited oxygen or catalysts. The resulting products can be used for: Electricity and heat generation Biofuel production (syngas, bio-oil)Chemical feedstocks Char and biochar for soil improvement Unlike biochemical conversion, which relies on microbial activity (e.g., fermentation, anaerobic digestion), thermochemical methods offer faster processing times and can handle a wider variety of feedstocks, including lignocellulosic biomass and contaminated waste. [

Complete oxidation of biomass in the presence of excess oxygen. Heat, carbon dioxide (CO?), and water. Direct heating or electricity generation in boilers and turbines. Less efficient for energy conversion; high emissions if not properly managed. Partial oxidation of biomass at high temperatures (700– 1,200°C) with limited oxygen or air. Syngas (CO, H?, CH?), which can be used for power, hydrogen, or synthetic fuels. Power generation, chemical synthesis, hydrogen production. High energy efficiency and lower emissions compared to combustion.[

Thermal decomposition in the absence of oxygen (typically 300–600°C).Bio-oil, syngas, and biochar. Liquid fuels, soil amendment, carbon sequestration. Fast pyrolysis (for bio-oil) and slow pyrolysis (for biochar).Conversion of wet biomass under moderate heat and pressure in a water-rich environment. Hydro char, a coal-like substance; also generates gases and liquids. Fuel production, soil conditioner. Can handle high moisture content feedstocks without prior drying Rapid conversion compared to biological methods. Handles a wide range of materials, including dry, wet, and contaminated waste. Particularly with gasification and pyrolysis. Offers flexibility in outputs (gas, oil, char).Decreases volume of organic and municipal waste going to landfills. Advanced reactors and clean-up systems are expensive. Requires stringent control of pollutants like tar, NOx, and particulate matter. Moisture content and composition affect process efficiency. Some technologies (e.g., HTC) are still at pilot or demonstration stage. [8].

Use gasification or combustion for renewable electricity. Convert MSW to syngas or heat via gasification and pyrolysis. Produce bio-oil from crop residues for transport fuel alternatives.Use biochar from pyrolysis to enhance soil fertility and lock carbon. [9, 10].

conclusion

Gasification is a forward-looking technology that bridges the gap between waste management and clean energy production. By converting a wide range of materials into syngas, it supports energy diversification, reduces landfill dependence, and cuts greenhouse gas emissions. While there are technical and economic challenges to overcome, advances in gas cleaning, reactor design, and policy support can unlock the full potential of gasification in a sustainable, low-carbon future.

References

  1. Mol MP, Zolnikov TR, Neves AC, et al. Healthcare waste generation in hospitals per continent: a systematic review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(28):42466-75.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Slutzman JE, Bockius H, Gordon IO, et al. Waste audits in healthcare: a systematic review and description of best practices. Waste Manag Res. 2023;41(1):3-17.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Janik-Karpinska E, Brancaleoni R, Niemcewicz M, et al. Healthcare waste—a serious problem for global health. Healthcare 2023;11(2):242.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Dihan MR, Nayeem SA, Roy H, et al. Healthcare waste in Bangladesh: Current status, the impact of Covid-19 and sustainable management with life cycle and circular economy framework. Sci Total Environ. 2023;871:162083.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Kenny C, Priyadarshini A. Review of current healthcare waste management methods and their effect on global health. Healthcare 2021; 9(3):284.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  6. Mulligan S, Hatton PV, Martin N. Resin-based composite materials: elution and pollution. Br Dent J. 2022;232(9):644-52.

    7. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Trajano GT, Vasconcelos OM, Pataca LC, et al. Anionic surfactants monitoring in healthcare facilities—a case of Belo Horizonte City, Brazil. Environ Monit Assess. 2022;194(4):248.

    8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  8. Shabani T, Jerie S. A review of the applicability of Environmental Management Systems in waste management in the medical sector of Zimbabwe. Environ Monit Assess. 2023;195(6):789.

    9. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Sarangi PK, Srivastava RK, Sahoo UK, et al. Biotechnological innovations in nanocellulose production from waste biomass with a focus on pineapple waste. Chemosphere. 2024;349:140833.

    10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  10. Nosheen F, Malik N, Mehmood Z, et al. Biomedical waste management associated with infectious diseases among health care professionals in apex hospitals of a typical south asian city. Environ Res. 2022;215:114240.

    11. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App