Current Trends in Cardiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Current Trends in Cardiology (2023) Volume 7, Issue 12

The emergence of a cytokine storm after myocardial infarction.

Gregor Lindner*

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.

*Corresponding Author:
Gregor Lindner
Department of Cardiac Surgery
University Medical Center, Rostock

Received:25-Nov-2023,Manuscript No. AACC-23-128831; Editor assigned:27-Nov-2023,PreQC No. AACC-23-128831(PQ); Reviewed:11-Dec-2023,QC No. AACC-23-128831; Revised:16-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AACC-23-128831(R); Published:25-Dec-2023,DOI:10.35841/aacc-7.12.235

Citation:Lindner G. The emergence of a cytokine storm after myocardial infarction. Curr Trend Cardiol. 2023;7(12):235.

Visit for more related articles at Current Trends in Cardiology


Myocardial infarction (MI), commonly known as a heart attack, is a life-threatening cardiovascular event that occurs when blood flow to a part of the heart muscle is severely reduced or blocked, leading to tissue damage or cell death. While the immediate consequences of an MI are well-documented, emerging research has shed light on a less understood phenomenon – the cytokine storm that can follow this cardiac event. This article explores the emergence of a cytokine storm after myocardial infarction, its implications for patient outcomes, and potential therapeutic strategies. Before delving into the intricacies of cytokine storms, it is crucial to understand the basics of myocardial infarction. Typically, MI occurs due to the rupture or erosion of a plaque in one of the coronary arteries, leading to the formation of a blood clot that obstructs blood flow. This deprived blood supply results in ischemia (lack of oxygen) and damage to the heart muscle. Immediate medical attention is essential to restore blood flow and minimize heart muscle damage.[1,2].

In the aftermath of an MI, the body initiates a complex inflammatory response aimed at repairing the damaged heart tissue. This inflammatory phase is critical for healing, as it involves the recruitment of immune cells and the release of signalling molecules called cytokines. These cytokines play a pivotal role in orchestrating the immune response and facilitating tissue repair.While inflammation is a necessary part of the healing process post-MI, sometimes this response becomes dysregulated, leading to a phenomenon known as a cytokine storm. A cytokine storm is an excessive and uncontrolled release of cytokines, which can have detrimental effects on the body. In the context of myocardial infarction, the emergence of a cytokine storm occurs when the inflammatory response goes into overdrive. Instead of facilitating tissue repair, excessive cytokine release can lead to collateral damage, exacerbating cardiac injury and contributing to adverse outcomes. The exact mechanisms by which a cytokine storm exacerbates cardiac damage are still under investigation. However, several key factors have been identified. Inflammation-induced cell death: Excessive cytokine levels can trigger apoptosis (cell death) in cardiac myocytes, further reducing the functional heart tissue [3,4].

Fibrosis and scarring: Prolonged inflammation can promote fibrosis, leading to the formation of non-contractile scar tissue within the heart, which impairs cardiac function.Cytokines can disrupt the normal function of blood vessels, impairing blood flow regulation and increasing the risk of future cardiovascular events.Cytokine storms can disrupt the electrical conduction system of the heart, leading to potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. The emergence of a cytokine storm after myocardial infarction has significant clinical implications. Patients who experience a severe cytokine storm are at higher risk of adverse outcomes, including heart failure, recurrent cardiac events, and even death. Detecting and managing this phenomenon is crucial for improving patient outcomes.[5,6].


Currently, there are no specific biomarkers to diagnose a cytokine storm post-MI. However, clinicians can monitor patients for signs of excessive inflammation, such as elevated levels of inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) or interleukin-6 (IL-6). Continuous monitoring of cardiac function through imaging techniques like echocardiography can also help identify worsening cardiac damage. Managing a cytokine storm after myocardial infarction is challenging, but several therapeutic strategies are being explored. Drugs that modulate the inflammatory response, such as corticosteroids or targeted anti-cytokine therapies, may help reduce excessive inflammation.[7,8].



Immunomodulation: Strategies to balance the immune response, such as regulatory T-cell therapy, are being investigated to prevent cytokine storms. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs can improve cardiac function and reduce inflammation, potentially mitigating the effects of a cytokine storm. Research is ongoing to identify specific targets within the cytokine signalling pathways that can be manipulated to prevent or control cytokine storms.[



  1. Hacke W. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of Atlantis, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. 2004;363: 768–74.10.
  2. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Chau PH. Low level of knowledge of heart attack symptoms and inappropriate anticipated treatment-seeking behaviour among older Chinese: a cross-sectional survey. J Epidemiol Community Health.2018;72:645–52.
  4. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Evenson KR. A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care. Int J Stroke.2009;4:187–99.
  6. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Horne R. Patients' interpretation of symptoms as a cause of delay in reaching Hospital during acute myocardial infarction. 2000;83:388–93.
  8. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Faiz KW. Prehospital delay in acute stroke and TIA. J Emerg Med. 2013;30:669–74.
  10. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Kamiyama D. Development in the Storm. Deve Cell. 2012;23(6):1103-10.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Gonzalez WD. What is a geomagnetic storm?. J Geo Res. 1994;99(A4):5771-92.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Rust MJ. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Nat Met. 2006;3(10):793-6.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Arnett JJ. Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. Psych. 1999;54(5):317.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Cotton WR. Storm and cloud dynamics. 1992;10-20.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App