Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Opinion Article - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 5

Surgical interventions and patient-centered outcomes: Bridging the gap.

Gary Weiss*

Department of Surgery

*Corresponding Author:
Gary Weiss
Department of Surgery
Health Cancer Institute

Received:24-Aug-2023,Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-115294; Editor assigned:28-Aug-2023,PreQC No. AAOSR-23-115294(PQ); Reviewed:11-Sept-2023,QC No.AAOSR-23-115294; Revised:16-Sept-2023,Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-115294(R); Published:22-Sept-2023,DOI: 10.35841/ aaosr-7.5.169

Citation: Weiss G. Surgical interventions and patient-centred outcomes: Bridging the gap. J Ortho Sur Reh.2023;7(5):169

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation


The therapy of a wide range of medical disorders has long included surgical operations, which hold the promise of better health and quality of life. The effectiveness and success of surgical operations go well beyond only the clinical results, though. The importance of bridging the gap between surgical practices and patients' overall well-being is highlighted in this abstract, which gives a thorough analysis of the crucial relationship between surgical treatments and patient-centered outcomes.[1].

A comprehensive approach to healthcare that considers not only the improvement of medical diseases but also how interventions affect patients' lives, experiences, and general satisfaction defines patient-centered outcomes. Despite their potential for transformation, surgical treatments have inherent physical, emotional, and social effects that go beyond the operating room. It is explained how patient-centered outcomes (such as quality of life, functional status, and patient-reported experiences) differ from clinical outcomes (such as morbidity, mortality, and illness resolution).[2].

The emphasis is on a paradigm change in favor of putting patient-centered outcomes first. It is emphasised that collaborative decision-making plays a crucial role in matching surgical procedures with the values, preferences, and goals of patients. This strategy promotes communication and cooperation between patients and healthcare professionals. Various medical professions investigate how surgical treatments affect patients' functional status and quality of life. This includes evaluating how treatments improve or impair patients' capacity for participation in routine tasks, employment, and social contacts. There is discussion of the psychological and emotional aspects of surgical treatments.[3].

This includes addressing patients' coping methods, body image issues, anxiety, and despair. It is emphasised the importance of postoperative recovery and rehabilitation in delivering the best patient-centered results. Examined are methods for enhancing recovery and reducing problems following surgery. It is investigated how PROMs can be used to evaluate and track patient-centered outcomes. The importance of including patient viewpoints while assessing the efficacy of surgical procedures is emphasised. Discussed are ethical conundrums involving striking a balance between clinical necessity and patient-centred objectives.[4].

This includes thinking about resource allocation, patient autonomy, and informed consent. It is discussed how to include patient-centered outcomes into healthcare policy, quality improvement programmers, and payment models, highlighting the necessity of systemic reforms to priorities holistic patient care. This investigation has shown the critical link between surgical procedures and patient-centered outcomes. In addition to improving people's general well-being, bridging the gap between surgical procedures and patient-centered care guarantees that healthcare delivery is in line with the values and preferences of those it serves. In order to create a healthcare system that is truly responsive to patients' needs and ambitions, patient-centered outcomes optimisation will become more and more important as healthcare develops.[5].


  1. Zhang D, Earp BE, Blazar P..Evaluation and management of unsuccessful carpal tunnel release.J Hand Surg Am. 2019;44(9):779-86.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Scott KL, Conley CR, Renfree KJ. Histopathologic evaluation of flexor tenosynovium in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.Plast Reconst Surg. 2019;143(1):169-75.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Kerr CD, Sybert DR, Albarracin NS.An analysis of the flexor synovium in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: Report of 625 cases J Hand Surg Am.1992;17(6):1028-30.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Sonnery-Cottet B, Saithna A, Quelard B, et al. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition after ACL reconstruction: A scoping review of the efficacy of interventionsBr J Sports Med.2019;53(5):289-98.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Cloitre A, Halgand B, Sourice S, et al. IL-36γ is a pivotal inflammatory player in periodontitis-Associated bone loss.Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19257.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App