Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (629)348-3199

Short Communication - Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine (2023) Volume 7, Issue 5

Sports orthopaedics in the digital age: Telemedicine and remote monitoring

Gnaneshwar Kumar

*Corresponding Author:
Gnaneshwar Kumar
Department of Orthopaedics,
Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research,
New Delhi, India

Received:26-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AAJPTSM-23-111706; Editor assigned:29-Aug-2023, PreQC No. AAJPTSM-23-111706 (PQ); Reviewed:15-Sep-2023, QC No. AAJPTSM-23-111706; Revised:18-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. AAJPTSM-23-111706(R); Published:25-Sep-2023, DOI:10.35841/aajptsm-7.5.169

Citation: Kumar G. Sports orthopaedics in the digital age: Telemedicine and remote monitoring. J Phys Ther Sports Med. 2023;7(5):169

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine


In the dynamic landscape of sports medicine, where athletes strive for peak performance while managing the risks of injury, the integration of technology has become a driving force of transformation. The digital age has not only redefined the boundaries of what is possible but has also revolutionized the way athletes receive orthopaedic care. In this era of innovation, the marriage of sports orthopaedics with telemedicine and remote monitoring stands as a testament to the power of technology to enhance accessibility, convenience, and efficiency in healthcare [1]. This article explores the impact of telemedicine and remote monitoring on sports orthopaedics, delving into the advantages, challenges, and transformative potential of these digital approaches in redefining the athlete's journey to recovery and performance optimization. As athletes and healthcare professionals embrace the opportunities presented by these advancements, the synergy between human expertise and technological prowess is poised to reshape the field of sports orthopaedics as we know it [2].

The rise of telemedicine in sports orthopaedics

Telemedicine, the practice of providing medical care remotely through digital communication tools, has gained remarkable traction in recent years. For athletes, especially those who frequently travel for competitions or are geographically distant from medical centers, telemedicine offers a game-changing solution. Through video consultations, athletes can connect with orthopaedic specialists from the comfort of their homes or training facilities, saving time and reducing the need for travel [3].

Advantages of telemedicine

  1. Accessibility: Telemedicine breaks down geographic barriers, enabling athletes to consult with renowned orthopaedic experts regardless of their location.
  2. Convenience: Athletes can schedule appointments at times that suit their training and competition schedules, eliminating the need for lengthy waiting room visits.
  3. Immediate care: In cases of acute injuries or urgent concerns, athletes can receive timely advice and recommendations from orthopaedic professionals without delay.
  4. Follow-up care: Post-treatment and surgery, athletes can continue to receive follow-up care remotely, ensuring their recovery progresses smoothly.
  5. Reduced costs: Telemedicine reduces the costs associated with travel, accommodation, and missed training or competition opportunities.

Remote monitoring for injury management

In addition to telemedicine, remote monitoring technologies have made a significant impact on sports orthopaedics. Wearable devices, sensors, and mobile apps now allow athletes and healthcare professionals to monitor various aspects of an athlete's condition, such as movement patterns, heart rate, and recovery progress [4]. This real-time data enables orthopaedic specialists to make informed decisions about treatment adjustments, rehabilitation plans, and return-to-play timelines.

Benefits of remote monitoring

  1. Objective tracking: Remote monitoring provides quantitative data on an athlete's progress, enabling evidence-based decisions in the management of injuries.
  2. Early detection: Deviations from established recovery patterns can be identified early, allowing healthcare professionals to intervene before minor issues escalate.
  3. Personalized care: Remote monitoring enables individualized treatment plans based on an athlete's real-time physiological responses and progress.
  4. Enhanced rehabilitation: Athletes can engage in guided exercises and rehabilitation protocols remotely, under the supervision of their orthopaedic team.
  5. Data-Driven training: Athletes and coaches can utilize monitoring data to adjust training programs, optimize performance, and reduce the risk of overuse injuries.

Challenges and considerations

While the integration of telemedicine and remote monitoring in sports orthopaedics holds immense promise, it is not without challenges. Data security, technological limitations, and the inability to conduct hands-on physical examinations are aspects that need careful consideration [5]. Additionally, ensuring that athletes receive the same level of personal connection and trust that comes from in-person visits is crucial.


The digital age has ushered in a new era of convenience and innovation in sports orthopaedics. Telemedicine and remote monitoring technologies have transformed the way athletes access care and manage injuries, making high-quality orthopaedic expertise available at their fingertips. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that these approaches will become even more sophisticated, contributing to better athlete outcomes, quicker recoveries, and ultimately, the advancement of sports medicine as a whole.


  1. Ismailidis P, Egloff C, Hegglin L, et al. Kinematic changes in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis are a result of reduced walking speed rather than disease severity. Gait  2020;79:256-61.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28(2):88-96.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(3):483-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Kobsar D, Barden JM, Clermont C, et al. Sex differences in the regularity and symmetry of gait in older adults with and without knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2022;95:192-7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  1. Nyquist H., Nyquist H. Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory. Trans Am Inst Electr Eng. 1928;47:617–624

Google Scholar

Get the App