Perspective - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2024) Volume 8, Issue 6
Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Revolutionizing the Future of Medicine
Yong Fischer *, Mudumba Vijayasaradhi, Rajesh Alugolu, Abhishek Arora
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University, China.
- Corresponding Author:
- Yong Fischer
Department of Orthopedic Surgery,
New York University
China
E-mail: yon@fischer.cn
Received: 02-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155726; Editor assigned: 04-Nov-2024, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-155726 (PQ); Reviewed: 18-Nov-2024, QC No. AAOSR-24-155726; Revised: 25-Nov-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-155726 (R); Published: 30-Nov-2024, DOI: 10.35841/aaosr-8.6.234
Citation: Fischer Y. Robotic-assisted surgery: Revolutionizing the future of medicine. J Ortho Sur Reh. 2024;8(6):234.
Abstract
Introduction
Robotic-assisted surgery is one of the most significant advancements in the field of medicine, combining cutting-edge technology with surgical precision to improve patient outcomes and reduce recovery times. This innovative approach has transformed the way surgeons perform procedures, offering enhanced capabilities, greater accuracy, and minimally invasive techniques. With the rapid growth of robotics and artificial intelligence, robotic-assisted surgery is not just a trend but a paradigm shift in healthcare. Robotic-assisted surgery refers to a minimally invasive surgical procedure that uses robotic systems to aid the surgeon in performing operations. These robotic systems, such as the da Vinci Surgical System, feature a console where the surgeon controls robotic arms equipped with surgical instruments. The system provides a magnified, high-definition view of the surgical site, allowing the surgeon to make highly precise movements with greater flexibility than traditional methods. Despite the robot's involvement, the surgeon remains in complete control of the procedure. [1,2].
Robotic systems offer superior precision compared to traditional techniques. The robotic arms can make fine, precise movements that reduce the risk of human error, especially in delicate surgeries like those performed on the heart, brain, or spine.One of the major advantages of robotic surgery is its minimally invasive nature. Smaller incisions reduce trauma to the body, resulting in less pain and a quicker recovery time for patients. Additionally, smaller scars are left behind, improving cosmetic outcomes.The advanced imaging systems in robotic surgery allow for a highly magnified, 3D view of the surgical site, which improves the surgeon's ability to detect and address potential issues. This enhanced visualization also allows for more detailed and accurate planning during surgery.Since robotic-assisted surgery is minimally invasive, patients often experience less postoperative pain, reduced bleeding, and shorter hospital stays. As a result, recovery times are typically quicker, allowing patients to return to their daily lives sooner. [3,4].
Robotic-assisted surgery reduces the physical strain on surgeons. Traditional surgeries often involve prolonged standing, awkward positioning, and physical exertion. The ergonomic design of robotic systems allows surgeons to perform procedures in a seated position with natural hand movements, leading to less fatigue and higher precision during lengthy procedures. Robotic-assisted surgery has been successfully applied across a range of medical specialties. Robotic surgery is commonly used in prostatectomies, kidney surgeries, and bladder procedures. The precision offered by robotic systems allows for the removal of cancerous tissues while preserving surrounding healthy tissues.In heart surgeries, robotic systems assist with procedures like valve repair, coronary artery bypass, and heart transplant. The precision and minimally invasive nature of the procedure reduce recovery times and surgical complications. [5,6].
Robotic assistance is utilized in knee, hip, and spinal surgeries. The accuracy of the robotic system ensures that implants are positioned optimally, enhancing the overall outcomes for patients. Robotic systems are frequently used in hysterectomies and other gynecological procedures. The ability to perform precise cuts and sutures ensures better patient recovery and fewer complications. From gallbladder removal to complex abdominal surgeries, robotic-assisted techniques offer reduced recovery times and minimal scarring. While robotic-assisted surgery offers many benefits, it is not without its challenges. The upfront cost of robotic systems is significant, and their maintenance requires ongoing investment. This can make robotic surgery less accessible in certain healthcare settings, particularly in low-resource environments. [7,8].
Surgeons must undergo extensive training to become proficient in using robotic systems. Mastery of robotic-assisted surgery requires not only knowledge of the technology but also the skill to integrate it seamlessly into clinical practice. While robotic systems provide enhanced precision and visualization, they are still limited by the technology available. In some cases, certain complex surgeries may not be suited for robotic assistance, and traditional techniques might still be preferred. Critics argue that the use of robotic systems may reduce the personal connection between surgeons and patients. The human element of care is critical in the healing process, and the role of the surgeon as a compassionate caregiver cannot be overlooked. [9,10].
Conclusion
Robotic-assisted surgery represents a revolutionary advancement in the medical field, bringing benefits to both surgeons and patients. Its precision, minimally invasive nature, and potential for quicker recovery times make it a powerful tool in modern healthcare. As technology continues to evolve, the role of robotic surgery will expand, making it an essential component of future medical practices
References
- Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(3):159-171.
- Liu X, Dong Z, Li J, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of surgical site infection after geriatric hip fracture surgery: A retrospective multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1-9.
- Sheridan E, Wiseman JM, Malik AT, et al. The role of sociodemographics in the occurrence of orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2019;50(7):1288-92.
- Court-Brown CM. The changing epidemiology of fall-related fractures in adults. Injury. 2017;48(4):819-824.
- Colman M. Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2013;44(2):249-52
- Shao J, Zhang H, Yin B, et al.Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Surg J. 2018;56:124-32.
- Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-697.
- Fares AB, Childs BR, Polmear MM, et al. Dorsal Bridge Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(7):627.e1-627.e8.
- Dan MacLeod, Common Dimensions, Ergoweb® Learning Center, September 8, 2013.
- Giddins G, Giddins H. Wrist and hand postures when falling and description of the upper limb falling reflex. Injury. 2021;52(4):869-876.
Indexed at, Google Scholar ,Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref