Current Trends in Cardiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Short Communication - Current Trends in Cardiology (2023) Volume 7, Issue 8

RNA editing and the epitranscriptome in heart failure

Jacek Kubica *

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Ciechanow, Ciechanow, Poland.

*Corresponding Author:
Jacek Kubica
Department of Cardiology
Medical University of Ciechanow
Ciechanow, Poland.

Received:27-Jul-2023, Manuscript No. AACC-23-107488; Editor assigned: 29-Jul-2023,PreQC No. AACC-23-107488 (PQ); Reviewed:12-Aug-2023,QC No. AACC-23-107488; Revised:17-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. AACC-23-107488 (R); Published:24-Aug-2023,DOI:10.35841/aacc-7.8.191

Citation: Kubica J. RNA editing and the epitranscriptome in heart failure. J Cell Biol Metab. 2023;7(8):191

Visit for more related articles at Current Trends in Cardiology


The arising utilization of immunotherapies in disease treatment builds the gamble of immunotherapy-related cardio toxicity. Rather than regular chemotherapy, these original treatments have extended the structures and introductions of cardiovascular harm to a wide range from asymptomatic changes to fulminant short-and long haul difficulties concerning cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, and vascular illness. In disease patients and, especially, malignant growth patients going through (resistant) treatment, cardio-oncological observing is a mind boggling exchange between pretherapeutic risk evaluation, recognizable proof of looming cardio toxicity, and post-remedial observation. For these reasons, the cardio-oncologist can return to a wide range of atomic cardio logical demonstrative workup.


Heart failure, Myocardial iron metabolism, Oxidative stress, Myocardial gathering proteins expression, Human model.


Cardiovascular breakdown (HF) is a typical sickness that causes critical limits on the living being's ability and, in outrageous cases, prompts demise. Clinically, iron lack (ID) assumes a fundamental part in cardiovascular breakdown by weakening the patient's condition and is a prognostic marker demonstrating poor clinical results. In this way, in HF patients, supplementation of iron is suggested. Nonetheless, iron treatment might cause unfriendly impacts by expanding iron-related apoptosis and the development of oxygen extremists, which might cause extra heart harm. Moreover, numerous information holes exist with respect to the complicated interchange between lack of iron and cardiovascular breakdown. Here, we depict the current, exhaustive information about the job of the proteins associated with iron digestion. We will zero in on the sub-atomic and clinical parts of lack of iron in HF.[1,2].

Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the mainstays of disease treatment. High-portion radiation openness on the chest is primarily utilized with regards to adjuvant RT after bosom a medical procedure, in lung and esophageal disease, and as a supplement to fundamental therapy in lymphoma. Because of the physical closeness, the heart unavoidably gets some radiation that can bring about intense and ongoing cardiotoxicity, prompting cardiovascular breakdown, coronary course infection, pericardial and valvular coronary illness. Current proof recommends there is no protected radiation portion to the heart, which represents a requirement for early acknowledgment of RT-prompted cardiovascular injury to start cardioprotective therapy and forestall further harm. Multimodality cardiovascular imaging gives an incredible asset to evaluate for underlying and utilitarian irregularities optional to RT [3].

Left ventricular discharge part, ideally with three-layered echocardiography or cardiovascular attractive reverberation (CMR), and worldwide longitudinal strain with dot following echocardiography are as of now the vital boundaries to distinguish cardiotoxicity. Cardiovascular breakdown with protected discharge division (HFpEF) is a condition characterized by the presence of cardiovascular breakdown side effects and expanded degrees of coursing natriuretic peptide (NP) in patients with safeguarded left ventricular launch portion and different levels of diastolic brokenness (DD). HFpEF is a mind boggling condition that incorporates many various etiologies. Cardiovascular imaging assumes a critical part in diagnosing HFpEF, in distinguishing explicit hidden etiologies, in prognostic delineation, and in remedial individualization. Echocardiography is the main line imaging methodology with its wide accessibility; it has high spatial and fleeting goal and can dependably evaluate systolic and diastolic capability [4].

Cardiovascular attractive reverberation (CMR) is the highest quality level for heart morphology and capability evaluation, and has better difference goal than search top to bottom into tissue changes and assist with distinguishing explicit HFpEF etiologies. Interest in epicardial fat tissue (EAT) is developing quickly, and research in this space requests to an expansive, multidisciplinary crowd. EAT is special in its life systems and unhampered vicinity to the heart and has a transcriptome and secretome altogether different from that of other fat stops. EAT has physiological and obsessive properties that differ contingent upon its area. It tends to be exceptionally defensive for the nearby myocardium through powerful earthy colored fat-like thermogenic capability and destructive by means of paracrine or vasocrine discharge of favorable to incendiary and profibrotic cytokines. EAT is a modifiable gamble factor that can be surveyed with conventional and novel imaging procedures. Coronary and left atrial EAT are associated with the pathogenesis of coronary supply route illness and atrial fibrillation, separately, and it additionally adds to the turn of events and movement of cardiovascular breakdown [5].


  1. Cohen MC, Aretz TH. Histological analysis of coronary artery lesions in fatal postoperative myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1999;8:133–39.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Orhan AL. Atrial fibrillation as a preoperative risk factor predicts long-term mortality in elderly patients without heart failure and undergoing hip fracture surgery.. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2021; 67:1633–38.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Waxman S. Plaque disruption and thrombus in Ambrose's angiographic coronary lesion types.. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 92:16–20.
  6. Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Sheth T. Incidence of thrombosis in perioperative and non-operative myocardial infarction.. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120:725–733.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Landesberg G. Perioperative myocardial infarction. Circulation . 2009;119:2936–44.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App