Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry (2023) Volume 7, Issue 3

Regulation of growth and development of camellia sinensis (tea plant) under abiotic and biotic stress

John Morris*

Department of Molecular Biology

*Corresponding Author:
John Morris
Department of Molecular Biology
University of Birmingham
United Kingdom
E-mail:johnm@bham.ac.uk

Received:17-May-2023, Manuscript No. AAJBP-23-101738; Editor assigned:19-May-2023, PreQC No. AAJBP-23-101738(PQ); Reviewed:03-Jun-2023, QC No. AAJBP-23-101738; Revised:07-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. AAJBP-23-101738(R); Published:14-Jun-2023, DOI:10.35841/ aajbp-7.3.148

Citation: Morris J. Regulation of growth and development of camellia sinensis (tea plant) under abiotic and biotic stress.2023;7(3):148

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry

Abstract

Camellia sinensis, commonly known as the tea plant, is a valuable crop in the global beverage industry. However, tea plants are susceptible to various abiotic and biotic stresses that can hinder their growth and development. This article explores the regulation of growth and development in Camellia sinensis under abiotic stresses such as temperature extremes, drought, salinity, and heavy metal toxicity, as well as biotic stresses including pathogens, pests, and herbivores. The tea plant has developed adaptive mechanisms to cope with these stresses, such as physiological and biochemical adaptations, activation of stress-responsive genes, and accumulation of compatible solutes. Additionally, the plant activates defense-related genes, produces antimicrobial compounds, and forms beneficial associations with microbes to combat biotic stresses

Keywords

Camellia sinensis, Tea plant, Growth regulation, Development regulation, Abiotic stress, Biotic stress, Temperature extremes.

Introduction

Camellia sinensis, commonly known as the tea plant, is an economically significant crop that plays a vital role in the global beverage industry. However, like any other plant, tea plants are susceptible to various stresses, both abiotic and biotic, which can significantly affect their growth and development. Understanding the regulation of growth and development under these stresses is crucial for ensuring the productivity and sustainability of tea cultivation. In this article, we will explore the impact of abiotic and biotic stress on Camellia sinensis and the mechanisms through which the plant regulates its growth and development to overcome these challenges[1].

Abiotic stress factors, such as temperature extremes, drought, salinity, and heavy metal toxicity, can negatively impact the growth and development of tea plants. These stressors disrupt the plant's physiological and metabolic processes, leading to reduced productivity and quality of tea leaves. However, tea plants have developed various adaptive mechanisms to cope with abiotic stress. Tea plants have a certain range of temperature tolerance for optimal growth. High temperatures can lead to increased respiration rates, accelerated water loss through transpiration, and reduced photosynthetic efficiency. Conversely, low temperatures can inhibit metabolic processes and damage cell membranes. Tea plants regulate their growth and development under temperature stress through physiological and biochemical adaptations, such as adjusting their photosynthetic machinery, activating stress-responsive genes, and accumulating compatible solutes to maintain cellular osmotic balance[2].

Water scarcity is a significant constraint for tea cultivation in many regions. Drought stress reduces the availability of water for tea plants, leading to stomatal closure, decreased photosynthesis, and ultimately, reduced growth. Tea plants respond to drought stress by closing stomata to minimize water loss, developing a deeper root system to access deeper soil moisture, and synthesizing protective compounds like proline and antioxidants to mitigate oxidative damage caused by drought-induced reactive oxygen species. Excessive salt concentration in the soil can disrupt the osmotic balance within tea plants, causing water stress and ion toxicity. Tea plants combat salinity stress through mechanisms such as ion exclusion, sequestration of toxic ions in vacuoles, and osmotic adjustment by accumulating compatible solutes. These strategies help maintain cellular homeostasis and reduce the toxic effects of salt. Tea plants can accumulate heavy metals from contaminated soils, which poses a risk to human health and affects plant growth. The regulation of heavy metal stress involves mechanisms like chelation, sequestration, and compartmentalization of toxic metals in the roots and shoots, as well as the activation of detoxification enzymes and antioxidants [3].

Tea plants face a range of biotic stresses caused by pathogens, pests, and herbivores. These biotic stressors can significantly impact tea production and quality. Tea plants have evolved complex defense mechanisms to combat biotic stress. Various fungal, bacterial, and viral pathogens can infect tea plants, causing diseases like blister blight, gray mold, and root rot. The regulation of plant growth and development under pathogen attack involves the activation of defense-related genes, synthesis of antimicrobial compounds, and reinforcement of cell walls through deposition of lignin and callose. Additionally, tea plants can form beneficial associations with certain microbes, such as mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria, which enhance their resistance to pathogens[4].

Insect pests, nematodes, and herbivores pose a constant threat to tea plants. These organisms feed on tea leaves, sap, or roots, leading to reduced growth and yield. Tea plants defend against pests and herbivores through multiple strategies, including the production of toxic secondary metabolites, such as catechins and caffeine, as well as the induction of physical barriers like trichomes and thorns. They can also release volatile compounds to attract natural enemies of pests, promoting biological control[5].

Conclusion

Regulating the growth and development of Camellia sinensis under abiotic and biotic stress is a critical aspect of ensuring the sustainability and productivity of tea cultivation. The tea plant has evolved a range of adaptive mechanisms to cope with these stressors, including physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses. Understanding these regulatory processes can help breeders and researchers develop stress-tolerant tea varieties and implement effective management practices to mitigate the negative impacts of abiotic and biotic stress. By safeguarding the growth and development of Camellia sinensis, we can continue to enjoy the aromatic and flavorful beverage that has been cherished for centuries.

References

  1. Tallevi SG, Dicosmo F. Stimulation of indole alkaloid content in vanadium treated Catharanthus roseus suspension cultures.. Planta Med. 1988;54:149–52.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Moreno PRH, Heijden RVD, Verpoorte R. Effect of terpenoid precursor feeding and elicitation on formation of indole alkaloids in cell suspension cultures of Catharanthus roseus . Plant Cell Rep. 1993;12:702-5.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Lee-Parsons CWT, Rogce AJ. . Precursor limitations in methyl jasmonate-induced Catharanthus roseus cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25:607-12.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Françoise B, Hossein S, Halimeh H, et al. Growth optimization of Zataria multiflora Boiss. Tissue cultures and rosmarininc acid production improvement. Pak J Biol Sci. 2007;10:3395-9.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Salma U, Rahman MSM, Islam S, et al. . The influence of different hormone concentration and combination on callus induction and regeneration of Rauvolfia serpentina. Benth. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11:1638-41.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App