Immunology Case Reports

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Commentary - Immunology Case Reports (2022) Volume 5, Issue 2

Patient with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, GM-CSF antibody reduction.

Aysenur Barksdal*

Department of Pathology, University of Wisconsin Hospital, Highland Ave, Madison, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Aysenur Barksdal
Department of Pathology
University of Wisconsin Hospital, Highland Ave
Madison, USA

Received: 28-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. AAICR-22-57698; Editor assigned: 02-Mar-2022, Pre QC No. AAICR-22-57698(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Mar-2022, QC No. AAICR-22-57698; Revised: 19-Mar-2022, Manuscript No. AAICR-22-57698(R); Published: 26-Mar-2022, DOI:10.35841/ DOI:10.35841/aaicr-5.2.106

Citation: Barksdal A. Patient with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, GM-CSF antibody reduction. Immunol Case Rep 2022;5(2):106

Visit for more related articles at Immunology Case Reports


We share our experience of a patient with pneumonic alveolar proteinosis who was recalcitrant to plasmapheresis and rituximab in spite of a critical decrease in the culpable neutralizer. He gave windedness, fevers, chills, and sweats for a considerable length of time. He was determined to have immune system PAP in view of run of the mill radiology discoveries, broncho alveolar liquid examination, and raised enemy of GM-CSF levels. Given his restricted improvement with entire lung lavage and breathed in GM-CSF treatment, he went through two series of plasmapheresis. Series one was 5 methods in 6 days, and series two was 5 strategies in 9 days followed by rituximab. These didn't seem to give any enduring clinical advantage in the year after plasmapheresis regardless of an undeniable decline in serum hostile to GM-CSF levels. In any case, about a year after plasmapheresis, he went into abatement and has not needed any treatment.


Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, Antibody reduction, Heterogeneous, Immune system, Entire lung lavage.


Aspiratory alveolar proteinases (PAP) are an interesting problem that is because of disturbed surfactant creation or macrophage-intervened freedom that prompts alveolar surfactant aggregation and a hindrance of gas trade. The sickness can give different indications going from exertional dyspnoea to superimpose perilous astute contaminations and hypoxic respiratory disappointment. PAP is heterogeneous, as it can have different etiologists [1].

Essential PAP is partitioned into innate or immune system (recently known as idiopathic or obtained) structures that are related with changes of qualities directing surfactant digestion (like CSF2RA) and autoantibodies against GM-CSF, individually. Hematologic problems and ecological openings (like silica) may disable macrophage capacity and cause auxiliary PAP. Immune system components represent over 90% of the cases. Notwithstanding the known connection between GM-CSF autoantibody-intervened hindrances in macrophage capacity and surfactant collection in alveolar spaces, no relationship between's circling autoantibody levels and infection seriousness has been accounted for. In any case, broncho alveolar liquid (BALF) autoantibody levels seem to correspond with markers of sickness seriousness (like radiological inclusion of lung, AaPO2, PaO2, and serum LDH levels) [2].

Entire lung lavage (WLL) is frequently portrayed as the norm of care and regularly utilized for fast side effect help inside the space of days for indicative patients. An exceptionally good guess of "the reaction rate" is 60%. On account of unmanageable or demolishing side effects, breathed in GM-CSF treatment can be utilized. Plasmapheresis and rituximab are seldom utilized treatments, as just not many case reports have analyzed the viability of these treatments. To add our experience to this scanty writing, we present a case report of a patient with immune system PAP who didn't show improvement following two series of plasmapheresis.

Case Presentation

The patient is a 28-year-old male with a background marked by asthma and smoking. He introduced to an external clinic with moderate windedness, fevers, chills, and sweats for a very long time. A figured tomography (CT) check showed two-sided geographic conveyances of ground glass opacities with sprinkled interlobular septal thickening. He depicted a useful hack with clear-to-white mucus. He took a short course of amoxicillin-clavulanate without progress in his side effects. His windedness advanced altogether following 4 months, and he likewise created haemoptysis. He was confessed to an external clinic where his underlying CT chest showed multifocal areas of ground glass darkness in the upper and lower flaps with relative saving of the fringe.

The differential finding around then included pneumocystis pneumonia, eosinophilia pneumonia, and arranging pneumonia, vacuities, immune system infections, and extreme touchiness pneumonitis. No natural antigen openness was recognized in his set of experiences. Irresistible infection markers for respiratory infections, HIV, mycobacteria, and organisms were negative. Immune system and provocative markers (counting ESR, CRP, ANA, ANCA, RF, and supplement levels) were negative. Bronchoscopy with BAL was performed and uncovered a smooth liquid that was PAS positive. He was released for short term follow-up. He detailed hypoxia at home (immersions for the most part around mid to bring down 80 s) with any movement. He couldn't endure PFT on his short term visit. His SPO2 on room air was 88%, and he required 2 liters each moment (LPM) to keep his SpO2 more noteworthy than 89%. Given his persevering side effects, he was eluded to our clinic for inception of WLL [3].

He announced a reliable hack with effort and clear mucus during his underlying assessment at our clinic. He denied debilitated contacts or on-going travel. He was working at a foundry making silica sand into projects for the beyond 3 years (6 days per week and 10 hours every day). He didn't report history/side effects of GERD. No family background of PAP was accounted for. He took no prescriptions other than depending on the situation ibuprofen. Of note, he had no set of experiences of statin use. He was a functioning smoker with a 7 pack-year history. Mysterious hematologic danger as a reason for optional PAP was prohibited by stream examination. Given his high neutralizer levels, immune system PAP was leaned toward yet PAP optional to silica openness couldn't be prohibited.

The first two-sided WLL was performed, and he was effectively intubated following a short course of mechanical ventilation. He didn't need O2 very still, however expected up to 2 L of O2 with action when he was released. He revealed beginning improvement in his respiratory status that endured a few days. He had expanding exercise narrow mindedness, expanding creation of purulent sputum, and irregular chills and sweats 5 days after the strategy. A recurrent CT chest performed at an external medical clinic again showed a "insane clearing" design with areas of sub pleural saving. Slight transient movement inside the basilar fragments of the right and left lower flaps were accounted for. He required 2 L of oxygen very still and 2-4 L on effort with a SpO2 of 72% on room air. He went through a recurrent WLL 20 days after the underlying technique. He was activated not long after the method and released on the next day.

Fourteen days after the second WLL, he detailed demolishing dyspnoea and hypoxemia for a couple of days. He likewise revealed expanding creation of purulent sputum and discontinuous chills and fevers. He denied any chest torment, haemoptysis, orthopnoea, edema, or weight gain. His deliberate immersions were during the 70s on room air and mid-90 s on 3 L of O2 at the external short term center. His CXR showed demolishing reciprocal opacities (more unmistakable on the left) when contrasted with previously, worried for fuel of his PAP. His blood vessel blood gas investigation showed the accompanying qualities on 2 L O2: PH = 7.45, PCO2 = 27, PO2 = 73, BICARBONATE = 18.0, BASE EXCESS = −4.0, and O2 SATURATION = 94.1. Of note, no post treatment blood vessel blood gas was accessible. His wandering oximeter concentrate on exhibited a progressively expanded oxygen necessity up to 5 L [4].

Given the intermittent side effects after WLL #2, he was conceded for WLL #3 as well as a progression of 5 plasmapheresis techniques in 6 days. Every helpful plasma trade (TPE) comprised of a 1-plasma volume trade by means of diffusive apheresis with 5% egg whites as the substitution liquid. His deliberate enemy of GM-CSF autoantibody level was 103 mcg/mL (ordinary <5.0) preceding the main TPE. After the third plasmapheresis strategy, his enemy of GM-CSF level diminished to 17.6 mcg/mL, yet the patient revealed no huge clinical improvement. He was begun on breathed in GM-CSF at the finish of this series of 5 TPEs. Only preceding being released, his wandering oximeter concentrate on showed negligibly expanded oxygen prerequisite up to 1 L. He was kept on nebulized GM-CSF and rehashed WLLs each 3 a month because of obstinate illness for term of around four months.

Four months after the main TPE series, another TPE series was attempted. Notwithstanding treatment with WLLs in the interceding time frame, he saw no enduring improvement. Subsequently, TPE was endeavoured again in light of the fact that it was very much endured and has a somewhat low secondary effect profile. He got a second series of 5 TPEs in 9 days. He was additionally given rituximab (1000 mg IV) once after the last strategy. Tragically, he revealed no huge clinical improvement after the second TPE series. For around one year after the second TPE series, he kept on requiring WLLs each 3 a month notwithstanding ceaseless breathed in GM-CSF treatment. By then, he revealed that he felt improved. For a very long time, he proceeded with the GM-CSF treatment however went through no WLLs. Additionally, by then, he likewise halted GM-CSF. Around 90 days subsequent to halting GM-CSF, an additional 6-minute walk test was performed. He required no supplemental oxygen either very still or subsequent to strolling around 1300 feet. The latest arrangement was to keep on holding both GM-CSF and WLL, as he is going away. [5]


  1. Suzuki T, Trapnell BC. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis syndrome. Clinics Chest Med. 2016;37(3):431-40.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Gough J. Silicosis and alveolar proteinosis. British Med J. 1967 Mar 11;1(5540):629.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Carnovale R, Zornoza J, Goldman AM, et al. Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis: its association with hematologic malignancy and lymphoma.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Inoue Y, Trapnell BC, Tazawa R, et al. Characteristics of a large cohort of patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in Japan. Am J Resp Critical Care Med. 2008;177(7):752-62.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Lin FC, Chang GD, Chern MS, et al. Clinical significance of anti-GM-CSF antibodies in idiopathic pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Thorax. 2006;61(6):528-34.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App