Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Short Communication - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2023) Volume 7, Issue 1

Organization of the Infection Prevention Program

Peng Zhong*

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

*Corresponding Author:
Peng Zhong
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, China
E-mail: zhopeng@wh.edu.cn

Received: 29-Dec-2022, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-87110; Editor assigned: 02-Jan-2023, PreQC No. AAOSR-23-87110(PQ); Reviewed: 17-Jan-2023, QC No. AAOSR-23-87110; Revised: 23-Jan-2023, Manuscript No. AAOSR-23-87110(R); Published: 30-Jan-2023, DOI: 10.35841/aaosr-7.1.134

Citation: Zhong P. Organization of the infection prevention program. J Ortho Sur Reh. 2023;7(1):134

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Introduction

The authoritative design for the contamination avoidance program ought to be custom-made to fulfill the needs of the clinic and to ideally utilize accessible assets. Huge emergency clinics with a high extent of tertiary consideration patients require a more mind boggling framework to address their issues. Every clinic ought to foster a contamination counteraction plan that frames the extent of the disease avoidance program, the overall and explicit objectives, and measurements used to evaluate progress toward those objectives. Intermittently consistently, the arrangement ought to be inspected and refreshed as objectives are met and new issues create. Toward the finish of every year, a more proper gamble evaluation ought to be led considering yearly information patterns and the discoveries reflected in the disease counteraction plan for the impending year [1].

An exceptional position is held by the hospital epidemiologist. In addition to overseeing the infection control programme directly and, in certain hospitals, directing the quality improvement programme, he or she must interact with numerous hospital departments, hospital managers, and extramural organizations. In regions with access to subspecialists, the job is typically filled by a doctor with training in infectious diseases. However, only around a quarter of them have further education in healthcare epidemiology. To discuss the duties and expectations of the position and to negotiate the human and material resources, including the salary support that will be made available to implement the infection prevention programme, the physician should meet with key hospital administrators before accepting the position of hospital epidemiologist. According to a 2006 survey, physician epidemiologists were paid an average of 0.85 full-time equivalents for hospitals with fewer than 200 beds and 1.79 full-time equivalents for those with more than 600 beds. The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America's position paper on infrastructure for infection control provides a great overview of the resources required to run an infection control programme [2].

An excellent infection prevention programme cannot function without talented infection preventionists. These people are typically licensed practical nurses with clinical experience or medical technologists with microbiology experience. Effective infection preventionists must have a solid grasp of the workings of the healthcare institution, as well as a working knowledge of epidemiologic principles and fundamental microbiology. The CDC advised hospitals to have one infection preventionist for every 250 beds in the 1980s. Since then, there have been fewer hospital beds, a noticeable increase in the number of critical care beds due to the severity of illness among hospitalized patients, an increase in infection control issues in the ambulatory setting, and a multitude of new responsibilities taken on by infection prevention programs [3].

It is advised that a multidisciplinary infection control committee meet at least four times each year. Members of the medical and nursing staffs, hospital administration, and those directly in charge of running the infection prevention programme should all be represented on this group. Additionally, the committee frequently has infection control specialists as well as representatives from the departments of employee health, housekeeping, central services, engineering, and maintenance, as well as the microbiology laboratory, pharmacy, and operating room. The practise of preventing HAIs has evolved significantly during the last few decades. A core group of experts, which includes the hospital epidemiologist, infection preventionists, a microbiologist, and the director of employee health, is therefore best suited to handle the majority of the committee's work [4].

The approval of the meeting's minutes should come first on the agenda. The representatives of the pharmacy, employee health department, clinical microbiology laboratory, and regional public health department then give succinct reports. Additionally, a summary of all blood borne pathogen exposures among healthcare professionals and communicable disease exposure workups from the preceding month is provided. Old business should ideally be maintained to a minimum. It is important to monitor current infection rates as well as other trending measures (such as hand hygiene compliance and influenza vaccine compliance). After then, further in-depth reports on a few topical concerns take up the most of the meeting's time. Invited visitors may talk about different facets of these subjects. A few current policies should also be reviewed, updated, and reapproved at each meeting on a regular basis [5].

Conclusion

Infection control programmes must be able to act rapidly to protect patients and healthcare professionals from emerging infectious illnesses and multidrug-resistant organisms, often even in the absence of sufficient information on the disease's mode of transmission. It is still difficult to safeguard immunosuppressed patients and healthcare personnel from environmental pathogens, as well as to protect the patient with a chronic blood borne illness and his or her patients.

References

  1. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-32.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Weinstein RA, Edmond M, Eickhoff TC. Who is steering the ship? External influences on infection control programs. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(11):1746-50.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Dudeck MA, Horan TC, Peterson KD, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2010, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(10):798-816.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Detsky ME, Etchells E. Single-patient rooms for safe patient-centered hospitals. Jama. 2008;300(8):954-6.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Marra AR, Edmond MB. Hand hygiene: state-of-the-art review with emphasis on new technologies and mechanisms of surveillance. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012;14(6):585-91.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App