International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +44-7360-538437

Editorial - International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology (2016) Volume 4, Issue 3

Introgression: In a Contact Zone of Two Closely Related Species? Not Necessarily

*Corresponding Author:
Andrzej Falniowski
Department of Malacology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Krakow, Poland

Received 11th October 2016; Accepted 13th October 2016; Published 17th October 2016

Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology

Introgressive hybridization, also known as introgression, is the gene flow from one species into the gene pool of another, by the repeated backcrossing of an interspecific hybrid with one of its parent species. Several recent studies have uncovered genetic evidence for hybridization and introgression in different animal groups (e.g. Bierne, et al., 2003; Kokshoorn and Gittenberger, 2012; Keller, et al., 2013; Morii, et al., 2015; Wenne, et al., 2016) although the introgressive hybridization is most often cryptic and only revealed from studies that combine nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data. It is expected to occur across hybrid zones, in sympatry or at least parapatry, and between closely related species (e.g. Katoh and Ribi, 1996). However, hybrids may occur sometimes between phylogenetically distant species, whose reproductive isolating mechanisms, inevitably effective during speciation process, later have been lost (Falniowski, et al., 1993).

Hauffenia Pollonera, 1898 and Kerkia Radoman, 1978 are two genera of minute (shell diameter about 1 mm) valvatoid-shelled snails. They both belong to the family Hydrobiidae, but not represent sister clade relationships, thus are rather distantly related phylogenetically. They inhabit caves and other subterranean waters in the Balkans. Rysiewska et al. (in press) reported introgression of the ‘Hauffenia’ mtDNA type from central Slovenia into two different clades of Kerkia, one from Ljubač in central Croatia, and another from Podgrade in southern Croatia. Two latter populations are about 150 km apart and belong to the Kerkia lineage considering the three nuclear loci. Their mtDNA was most similar to Hauffenia erythropomatia (Hauffen, 1856) from the cave Babja luknja in Slovenia, about 210 km and 360 km from Ljubač and Podgrađe, respectively. The introduced ‘Hauffenia’ mtDNA type and the closest H. erythropomatia COI differed by 0.8% only.

The tendency of mtDNA to cross interspecific barriers is somewhat counterintuitive as it could give rise to hybrid disfunction due to the key function of enzymes involved in the oxidative-phosphorylation process. Besides through recombination and horizontal gene transfer, such crossing can happen through hybridization, when F1 hybrids backcross with one or both parental species and foreign genetic material is integrated into the genomes of either parent. Introgressive hybridization obscures species boundaries. Hence, the study of interspecific gene flow is fundamental to understand the molecular mechanisms of speciation and species delimitation, how species maintain their biological integrity despite exchanging genes and the role of adaptation in the process of genetic introgression (Arnold, 2006). Gene flow between closely related taxa may be a product of a neutral event that has no effect on an individual’s phenotype or fitness, or adaptive consequences of hybridization and gene exchange may occur (Arnold, 2006; Abbott et al., 2013). The interspecific mtDNA gene flow via hybridization has been documented mainly in the contact zones (e.g. Morii et al., 2015; Harrison and Larson, 2014; Wenne et al., 2016) and between closely related taxa. Several hundred kilometers, as well as high level of phylogenetic distance between populations of Kerkia and Hauffenia can therefore cast doubt on the adequacy of postulating the introgression as a cause for similarity in the COI gene.

Possible explanations would be that either pseudogene would have been amplified in Kerkia from Podgrađe and Ljubač, or strong natural selection would act similarly upon populations involved. The lack of stop codons and indels in the COI sequences, as well as their identical length, both contradict the anticipated pseudogenes. Meanwhile the presence of the Hauffenia- and Kerkia type haplotypes in Ljubač population rejects the selection theory. Considering the fact that Kerkia and Hauffenia are still living in sympatry in some places (e.g. cave Krška jama, although without introgression), such a situation with the subsequent hybridization might well existed also in the past. Later, the transfer of the “new” introduced mtDNA to other Kerkia populations and its subsequent loss in some of them might occur – possibly as a result of natural selection or genetic drift.

As already stated above, hybridization between distantly related taxa may sometimes occur (e.g. Falniowski, et al., 1993). Huge geographical distance among the populations listed above is harder to comprehend. It might simply be overestimated due to the undersampling. Little or no information is available on the abundance and distribution of the interstitial (wells, gravel bars) and stygobiotic (caves) microgastropods as limited accessibility coupled with tininess makes their sampling extremely challenging. Mainly, collections consist exclusively of the empty shells and therefore the vast majority of the subterranean snails are known only from their shell morphology. Sampling is highly weather-dependent; the best time is after heavy rains following a prolonged dry period. Usually several repeat visits to the site are required to obtain at least some living specimens. Apart from the undersampling, degradation of water resources in the Balkans might have contributed to the extensive fragmentation of species ranges, increasing the distances among our taxa. Animals adapted to subterranean environments are thought to be highly geographically isolated due to their limited tolerance of physical conditions on the surface as well as limited dispersal ability. However, such isolation is not necessarily the case, and several records of unexpectedly high levels of gene flow between springs, also the ones theoretically isolated, are known. Moreover, the distribution of the interstitial fauna might be much more continuous than already recorded, due to data deficiency. Anyway, a recent contact between Hauffenia erythropomatia and Kerkia from Podgrađe and Ljubač is unlikely. So the introgressed mtDNA probably represents a remnant of past hybridization and may reflect ancestral continuous distribution of the studied taxa.


  1. Abbott, R., Albach, D., Ansell, S., Arntzen, J. W., Baird, S. J. E., Berne, N., Boughman, J., Brelsford, A., Buerkle, C. A., Buggs, R., Butlin, R. K., Dieckmann, U., Eroukhmanoff, F., Grill, A., Cahan, S. H., Hermansen, J. S., Hewitt, G., Hudson, A. G., Jiggins, C., Jones, J., Keller, B., Marczewski, T., Mallet, J., Martinez-Rodriguez, P., Möst, M., Mullen, S., Nichols, R., Nolte, A. W., Parisod, C., Pfennig, K., Rice, A. M., Ritchie, M. G., Seifert, B., Smadja, C. M., Stelkens, R., Szymura, J. M., Väinölä, R., Wolf, J. B. W. and, Zinner, D., 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol., 26: 229-246.
  2. Arnold, M. L., 2006. Evolution through Genetic Exchange. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York.
  3. Bierne, N., Borsa, P., Daguin, C., Jollivet, D., Viard, F., Bonhomme, F. and David, P., 2003. Introgression patterns in the mosaic hybrid zone between Mytilusedulisand M. galloprovincialis. Mol. Ecol., 12: 447-461.
  4. Falniowski, A., Kozik, A. and Szarowska, M., 1993. Two common European viviparid species hybridize. Am. Malacol. Bull., 10: 161-164.
  5. Harrison, R. G. and Larson, E.L., 2014. Hybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries. J. Hered., 105:795-809.
  6. Katoh, M. and Ribi, G., 1996. Genetic evidence for natural hybridization and apparent introgression between freshwater snail species (Viviparusater and V. contectus). J. Evol. Biol., 9: 67-82.
  7. Kokshoorn, B. and Gittenberger, E., 2012. Phylogeography of the land snail Abidasecale(Draparnaud, 1801) (Chondrinidae). J. Moll. Stud.,78: 128-133.
  8. Morii, Y., Yokoyama, J., Kawata, M., Davison, A, and Chiba S., 2015. Evidence of introgressive hybridization between the morphologically divergent land snails Ainohelix and Ezohelix. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 115: 77-95.
  9. Rysiewska, A., Prevorčnik, S., Osikowski, A., Hofman, S., Beran, L. and Falniowski, A., in press. Phylogenetic relationships inKerkia and introgression between Hauffeniaand Kerkia (Caenogastropoda: Hydrobiidae). J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res.
  10. Wenne, R., Bach, L., Zbawicka, M., Strand, J., McDonald, J.H., 2016. A first report on coexistence and hybridization of Mytilustrossulus and M. edulis mussels in Greenland.Polar Biol., 39: 343-355.
Get the App