Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Rapid Communication - Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry (2022) Volume 6, Issue 2

Information on metagenomic profiles of bacterial endophyte communities related with Dicoma Anomala

Serepa Dlamini*

Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa

*Corresponding Author:
Serepa Dlamini
Department of Biotechnology and Food Technology
University of Johannesburg
Johannesburg 2028, South Africa

Received: 30- Mar -2022, Manuscript No. AAJBP-22- 60541;  Editor assigned 1- APR-2022, PreQC No. AAJBP -22- 60541 (PQ); Reviewed:  21- Apr-2022, QC No AAJBP -22- 60541; Revised: 18- Apr -2022, Manuscript No. AAJBP -22- 60541 (R); Published: 28- Apr -2022, DOI: 10.35841/aajbp-6.2.107

Citation: Dlamini S. Information on metagenomic profiles of bacterial endophyte communities related with Dicoma Anomal. J Biotech and Phytochem. 2022;6(2):107

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Biotechnology and Phytochemistry


Plants harbor changed communities of bacterial endophytes which play a pivotal part in plant wellbeing and development. Dicoma anomala could be a therapeutic plant that's known for its amazing ethnomedicinal employments which incorporate treatment of hacks, fever, ulcers, and diarrhea. This information in Brief article gives data on the differences of bacterial endophytes related with a restorative plant, Dicoma anomala focusing on the 16S rRNA quality utilizing Illumina sequencing innovation amid three diverse seasons.


Tmv, Epithelial carcinoma, Sars-CoV-2


Endophytes are non-pathogenic microorganisms that dwell inside the intracellular tissues of have plants without causing any hurt. Endophytes are a fundamental component of the plant micro-bionetwork as they are known to play a imperative part in plant development, wellbeing, and efficiency. Metagenomics analyzes hereditary fabric gotten specifically from a natural test in conjunction with other omics instruments such as proteomics, transcriptomics and genomics has revolutionized the investigation of plant microbiota intuitive by clearing a way for culture free strategies through investigating microbial communities. Met genomic profiles of endophytic microscopic organisms were disconnected from surface sterilized clears out and roots of Dicoma anomala, focusing on the 16S rRNA qualities [1]. Illumina sequencing innovation was utilized to uncover the differences of bacterial endophyte communities, characterize prevailing taxa of bacterial endophytes from Dicoma anomala plant collected at diverse seasons, and to compare the bacterial endophyte communities facilitated in this plant amid diverse seasons in roots and clears out Dicoma anomala may be a therapeutic plant that's dispersed in Sub-Sahara Africa; in South Africa it is found in Gauteng, Limpopo, and Free-State areas Taking after quality sifting, cancellation of chimeras, singletons, mitochondrial and chloroplast groupings, a add up to of 214 060 peruses were gotten from 7 tests. One test was not included within the examination of bacterial community structure due to a moo number of grouping peruses. The most elevated number of peruses was gotten from the leaf tissues (85 316) collected in October, taken after by the root tissues (60 204) collected in April. The takes off too had a lower number of peruses (311) in April whereas for the roots the most reduced number of peruses was gotten in June with 579 peruses as appeared in. The groupings were doled out operational ordered units (OTU) clustering at a 97% cut- off likeness and add up to of 3 675 OTUs were gotten after evacuating outright singleton.

The OTUs were conveyed among the 7 tests as demonstrated in Table 1. There were 1 863 OTUs within the by and large spring dataset taken after by 1 708 OTUs within the winter dataset and 104 OTUs within the harvest time dataset, separately. The roots tests had lower number of OTUs: 65 in harvest time; 133 in winter and 817 in spring whereas for the takes off the least number of OTUs was watched in harvest time with 39 OTUs. The most elevated number of OTUs watched for the clears out tests was in winter and spring with 1 575 and 1 046, individually Differences lists between the roots and takes off demonstrated a critical distinction between the roots and the clears out collected within the three seasons (p < 0.5). In spite of the fact that no significant differences were watched within the alpha differences (Shannon record), we watched a critical contrast of differences of endophytic microbes which was collected from the distinctive months [2]. In any case, gathering the differing qualities lists concurring to months appeared that the differing qualities of entophytic microscopic organisms shifted from one season to the other.

The differences list for the roots collected in harvest time was essentially lower than in spring and winter whereas for the takes off the differences list was altogether lower in harvest time than in spring, early winter, and late winter. Plant roots and clears out were surface sterilized taking after the convention by Hassan, with slight alterations. Briefly, the roots and the takes off were independently washed with running tap water to expel following soil particles, taken after by a wash with sterile refined water earlier to surface sterilization. The tests were consecutively washed by dousing in (i) 70% ethanol for 1 diminutive, (ii) 2. 5 % sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes, (iii) 70 % ethanol for 30 sec, and (iv) flushed five times in sterile refined water to evacuate any follows of the arrangements utilized. To affirm the victory of sterilization, 100 µL of the final wash was plated on supplement agar (NA) plates as control and hatched at 28°C for 24-72 hours. Adequacy of the sterilization strategy was observed on the control plates, with development demonstrating destitute sterilization [3].

When development had happened, the plates were disposed of, and the sterilization prepare was rehashed. For the roots, the external surfaces were trimmed out. The plant organs were at that point macerated in sterilized phosphate buffered saline. To guarantee that epiphytes were evacuated, little parts of the roots and takes off were cut and plated on NA and brooded at 28°C for 72 hours. Plates with no development were chosen for DNA extraction. Plant powders were put away at -22°C for future utilize. Add up to met genomic DNA extraction was performed utilizing the adjusted strategy portrayed by Murray and Thompson. Sterilized Eppendorf tubes were utilized to gather the powdered plant fabric and set on ice. Briefly, a preheated arrangement of 2X Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and 1 µL β-mercaptoethanol was included to the plant powders. The blends were vortexed for 20 seconds and hatched at 65°C for 1 hour. Taking after brooding, 600 µL chloroform/isoamyl (24:1 v/v) arrangements was included to each tube and altered for 5 min. The tubes were centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 5 min [4].

The supernatant (∼500-550 µL) was collected and exchanged to sterile Eppendorf tubes. An rise to volume of ice-cold isopropanol and RNase (10−1 last concentration) was included to the supernatant and modified. The tubes were hatched at room temperature for 20 min taken after by centrifugation at 12 000 rpm for 5 min to recuperate the metagenomic DNA. The supernatant was disposed of and pellets discuss dried. The DNA pellets were washed twice with 250 µL of 70% ethanol and centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 5 min some time recently drying in a laminar stream. The DNA was re-suspended in 50 µL nuclease free water and measured employing a Nanodrop ND-2000 UV-Vis spectrophotometer some time recently capacity at -20°C for future utilize [5].



  1. Murray MG, Thompson WF.Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucl Acids Res. 1980;19:4321-26.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. van Elsas JD, Speksnijder AJ, van Overbeek LS, et al. A procedure for the metagenomics exploration of disease-suppressive soils. J Micro Meth. 2008;75:515-22.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Carola S, Rolf D. . Metagenomic analyses: Past and future trends. Appl Env Micro. 2011;77:1153-61.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Balogen FO, Ashafa AOT. Aqueous roots extract of Dicoma anomala Sond ameliorates isoproterenol-induced myocardial infection in Wistar rats. Tro J Phar Res. 2016;15:1651-57.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Hassan SE. Plant growth-promoting activities for bacterial and fungal endophytes isolated from medicinal plant. J Adv Res. 2017;666-87.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App