Journal of Pregnancy and Neonatal Medicine

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +441518081136

Mini Review - Journal of Pregnancy and Neonatal Medicine (2024) Volume 8, Issue 1

Gestational Age: Key Indicator in Obstetrics and Neonatology

Christos Mastorakos *

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

*Corresponding Author:
Christos Mastorakos
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

Received:30-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. AAPNM-24-126908; Editor assigned: 1-Feb-2024, PreQC No. AAPNM-24-126908 (PQ); Reviewed:15-Feb-2024, QC No. AAPNM-24-126908; Revised:20-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. AAPNM-24-126908(R); Published:27-Feb-2024, DOI:10.35841/aapnm -8.1.188

Citation: Mastorakos C. Gestational Age: Key Indicator in Obstetrics and Neonatology. J Preg Neonatal Med. 2023;8(1):188

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Pregnancy and Neonatal Medicine


Gestational age stands as a cornerstone in obstetrics and neonatology, serving as a pivotal metric for assessing fetal development, guiding clinical decision-making, and predicting neonatal outcomes. Defined as the duration of pregnancy from the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) to the current date, gestational age plays a critical role in monitoring the progress of pregnancy and determining the optimal timing for interventions when complications arise. This comprehensive parameter encompasses various methods of estimation, each with its unique advantages and limitations, ensuring a nuanced approach to patient care and management. From dating pregnancies to anticipating preterm birth risks, understanding gestational age dynamics is fundamental in providing high-quality obstetric and neonatal care [1].

Accurate determination of gestational age begins with establishing the date of the woman's last menstrual period. While this method relies on the assumption of a 28-day menstrual cycle with ovulation occurring on day 14, it serves as a practical starting point for estimating gestational age, especially when ultrasound dating is unavailable or impractical. However, reliance solely on LMP dating may introduce inaccuracies, particularly in cases of irregular menstrual cycles or unreliable menstrual history [2].

Ultrasound assessment emerges as the gold standard for estimating gestational age due to its precision and reliability. By visualizing embryonic and fetal structures, ultrasound enables direct measurement of gestational sac dimensions, crown-rump length, and biometric parameters, providing a more accurate estimation of gestational age, especially in the first trimester. Furthermore, ultrasound facilitates the detection of fetal anomalies and growth abnormalities, guiding prenatal diagnosis and intervention strategies [3].

In cases where uncertainty persists or discrepancies arise between LMP and ultrasound dating, additional methods such as fetal biometry, Doppler velocimetry, and biochemical markers may offer complementary information for refining gestational age estimation. Fetal biometry involves measuring specific fetal dimensions, such as biparietal diameter and femur length, and comparing them to gestational age-specific norms to assess fetal growth and development. Doppler velocimetry assesses blood flow patterns in fetal and placental vessels, aiding in the evaluation of fetal well-being and assessing the risk of intrauterine growth restriction [4].

Biochemical markers, including maternal serum analytes and fetal DNA, can also provide valuable insights into gestational age and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Beyond its role in dating pregnancies, gestational age serves as a critical determinant of fetal viability and neonatal outcomes. Preterm birth, defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation, represents a significant public health concern due to its association with increased neonatal morbidity and mortality. Gestational age assessment allows clinicians to identify pregnancies at risk of preterm delivery and implement preventive measures, such as antenatal corticosteroids and progesterone supplementation, to mitigate adverse outcomes. Moreover, accurate gestational age estimation facilitates the appropriate timing of elective cesarean delivery and induction of labor, optimizing maternal and neonatal outcomes [5].

Gestational age is a fundamental parameter in obstetrics and neonatology, crucial for assessing the developmental stage of the fetus and predicting pregnancy outcomes. It refers to the duration of pregnancy measured from the first day of the mother's last menstrual period (LMP) to the current date. This metric serves as a key indicator for monitoring fetal growth and well-being throughout pregnancy, guiding clinical decision-making, and optimizing maternal and neonatal care [6].

In obstetrics, gestational age helps establish the timing of important prenatal interventions, such as screening tests, ultrasound examinations, and prenatal counseling. It also aids in the identification of pregnancies at risk of complications, such as preterm birth or intrauterine growth restriction, allowing healthcare providers to implement appropriate management strategies and improve outcomes for both mother and baby [7].

In neonatology, accurate gestational age estimation is crucial for assessing neonatal maturity and guiding the care of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). It allows healthcare providers to anticipate the unique needs and challenges faced by preterm newborns, tailor interventions to promote optimal growth and development, and minimize the risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Overall, gestational age serves as a vital tool in obstetric and neonatal practice, facilitating the delivery of timely and personalized care to pregnant women and their newborns [8].

In neonatology, gestational age serves as a key prognostic factor for assessing neonatal maturity and guiding neonatal intensive care management. Premature infants born at earlier gestational ages face greater risks of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis due to immature organ systems and physiologic instability. Conversely, post-term infants born after 42 weeks of gestation are at increased risk of meconium aspiration syndrome, macrosomia, and stillbirth due to placental insufficiency and fetal compromise. Gestational age-specific care protocols, tailored to the unique needs of preterm, term, and post-term infants, aim to optimize neonatal outcomes and reduce the burden of neonatal morbidity and mortality [9].

Despite its clinical significance, gestational age estimation is not without limitations and challenges. Inaccuracies in dating methods, variations in fetal growth trajectories, and the influence of maternal factors such as obesity and diabetes can complicate the interpretation of gestational age data and impact clinical decision-making. Furthermore, disparities in access to prenatal care and ultrasound services may disproportionately affect the accuracy of gestational age assessment in underserved populations, highlighting the importance of addressing healthcare inequities to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes [10].


Gestational age stands as a fundamental parameter in obstetrics and neonatology, guiding clinical practice from prenatal care to neonatal intensive care. Accurate estimation of gestational age enables healthcare providers to monitor fetal development, identify pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes, and tailor interventions to optimize maternal and neonatal health. By leveraging a multidisciplinary approach that incorporates various dating methods and clinical assessments, clinicians can effectively navigate the complexities of gestational age determination and provide evidence-based care to pregnant women and their newborns, ultimately improving outcomes across the continuum of pregnancy and childbirth.


  1. van der Geest BA, de Mol MJ, Barendse IS, de Graaf JP, et al. Assessment, management, and incidence of neonatal jaundice in healthy neonates cared for in primary care: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):14385.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Grajczyk A, D?aman K, Czerwaty K, et al. A Relation between Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy and Delivering Small for Gestational Age Infant—A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18):5972.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. McHugh A, Breatnach C, Bussmann N, et al. Prenatal prediction of neonatal haemodynamic adaptation after maternal hyperoxygenation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1-0.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Jahanfar S, Ho JJ, Jaafar SH, et al. Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021(3).
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Uta M, Craina M, Marc F, et al. Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 Vaccination on Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2024;12(1):102.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Tousty P, Fraszczyk-Tousty M, Dzidek S, et al. Low-Dose Aspirin after ASPRE—More Questions Than Answers? Current International Approach after PE Screening in the First Trimester. Biomedicines. 2023;11(6):1495.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  13. Brandstetter M, Neuner M, Dinges C, et al. Fetal Doppler Monitoring During Maternal Open-Heart Surgery: Case report and key aspects of a multidisciplinary challenge. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  15. Ionescu CA, Calin D, Navolan D, et al. Alobar holoprosencephaly associated with a rare chromosomal abnormality: Case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(29).
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  17. Dodd JM, Andersen C, Dickinson JE, et al. Fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler to time intrauterine transfusion in red?cell alloimmunization: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  19. Mead MJ, McWhorter CA, Rodgers MD, et al. Does maternal vitamin D status influence placental weight or vascular and inflammatory pathology? Secondary analysis from the Kellogg Pregnancy Study. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2023;233:106358.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App