Research Article - International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology (2019) Volume 7, Issue 3
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF LEAF EXTRACT OF MANGIFERA INDICA+ROOT EXTRACT NAUCLEA LATIFOLIA IN LABORATORY RAT: TOWARDS THE CONTROL OF GASTRO INTESTINAL HELMINTHES INFECTION
Mohammed A Rufai1* and Akeem Akinboro2
1Department of Zoology, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Osun State University, Osogbo, Nigeria
2Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Ladoke Akintola University (LAUTECH), Ogbomosho, Nigeria
- Corresponding Author:
- Mohammed A Rufai
Department of Zoology, College of Science
Engineering and Technology, Osun State
University, Osogbo, Nigeria
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Date: 17th June, 2019; Accepted Date: 24th June, 2019; Published Date: 30th June, 2019
DOI: 10.35841/2320-9585.7.36-40Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Pure and Applied Zoology
There are a large number of plants whose anthelmintic activity has been demonstrated under controlled experimentation, either through feeding the whole plant or administering plant extracts to parasitised hosts. However, contrary to traditional expectation, there are also a great number of plants with purported antiparasitic properties, which have not been reproduced under experimental conditions. Studies on the helminthicidal activities of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia in mice was designed to determine their efficacies against intestinal helmithes. Sixty Swiss albino mice maintained conventionally were selected randomly from laboratory animal house. The collected faecal samples were examined by simple faecal flotation techniques for isolation of parasitic eggs and/or oocysts. 42 (70.0%) of the mice under study were infected with at least one gastro intestinal parasite. The leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia was prepared by boiling in tap water. Graded concentrations (100%, 50%, 25% and 12.5%) of stock that was produce in Tetfund Zoology Laboratory of Osun State University was tested against both mice of different weights and sexes for helminthicidal efficacy. LC50 of the extract value obtained was found to be 75 mg/l in both big and small mice. Prevalence of gastrointestinal infections reduced with increased concentration of extract. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant difference in the means of the treatment concentrations and the rates of prevalence of gastrointestinal infections in the sampled mice. The results of this research showed that the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia are highly active against intestinal helminths in the sampled mice. The extract action also had significant influence (p>0.05) on the time of exposure of mice and the rate of prevalence. The safety of the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia on vital organs of humans may need to be investigated to determine its safety on humans.
Efficacy; Root extracts; Mangifera indica; Nauclea latifolia; Swiss albino mice; Gastro intestinal parasitic parasites
Intestinal tract parasites cause significant morbidity and mortality throughout the world, particularly in undeveloped countries where there is limited access to safe drinking water, sanitation, and nutrition (Anosike et al., 2006). They are widely distributed throughout the world causing substantial implication to the public health, economy, and physical and cognitive development particularly among children in developing countries like Nigeria. The poor personal hygiene, poor environmental hygiene, and poor health system commonly observed in developing countries make the prevalence to be highest among these populations (PAHO, 2011).
Intestinal parasites are most prevalent in children of schoolgoing- age, pregnant women and immune-compromised individuals (Anosike et al., 2006). Children with parasite infections may suffer from a wide variety of symptoms including anaemia as well as a myriad of mental and physical problems (Rufai and Awi – Waadu, 2006). As intestinal parasites survive by removing important nutrition from their human host, children infected with gastrointestinal parasites may have decreased mental and physical development. Thus the parasitic disease may have far greater effects than are immediately apparent and may decrease the learning ability and productivity of infected children. Intestinal parasite infestation in pregnant women is also of particular concern. It may result in anaemia, a weakened immune system and a resulting susceptibility to infections, all of which may affect foetal survival and development (Tsoka-Gwegweni and Ntombela, 2014). Maternal intestinal parasite infestation may result in low birth-weight infants who are also susceptible to infections and have developmental problems. Even postnatal, maternal infestation may cause lethargy and malaise which may adversely affect the mothers’ ability to provide adequate care for the infant.
Studies have established that some types of worm are in the intestines of over 75 percent of the world’s population’. This is a frightening statement. Common intestinal parasites include: Roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), Hookworm (Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenal), Pinworm (Enterobius vermicularis), Roundworm (Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati), Heart worm (Dirofilaria immitis), Strongyloides (Stronglyoides stercoralis), Trichinella (Trichinella spiralis) (Mehmet and Oprah, 2015).
The main drugs used to treat human intestinal parasites nowadays are mebendazole, albendazole, pyrantel pamoate, and levamisole for intestinal nematodes, ivermectin (IVM) for onchocerciasis, and DEC alone or DEC-albendazole and IVM-albendazole combination treatments for filariasis (Albonico et al., 1999). Depending on local epidemiology, availability, and cost, these drugs have been widely available in most health care systems for the curative treatment of clinical cases for many years.
In recent years, several reports of apparent failures in the treatment of intestinal parasites and nematodes have been published (De Clercq et al., 1997, Ismail et al., 1996). These have led to an increased awareness of the potential problem of anthelmintic resistance in the treatment and control of human helminths.
Even multiple drug resistance is not uncommon in helminths of veterinary importance. In parts of Paraguay (Maciel et al., 1999), helminths are resistant to all available broadspectrum anthelmintics and farmers have started to give up sheep farming because of insurmountable problems with anthelmintic resistance (Reynoldson et al., 1997).
Because vaccinations do not work in most instances and the parasites have sometimes become resistant to the available synthetic therapeutics, it is important to search for alternative sources of anti-parasitic drugs. Plants produce a high diversity of secondary metabolites with interesting biological activities, such as cytotoxic, anti-parasitic and anti-microbial properties. These drugs often interfere with central targets in parasites, such as DNA (intercalation, alkylation), membrane integrity, microtubules and neuronal signal transduction. Plant extracts and isolated secondary metabolites which can inhibit protozoan parasites, such as Plasmodium, Trypanosoma, Leishmania, Trichomonas and intestinal worms are discussed. The identified plants and compounds offer a chance to develop new drugs against parasitic diseases. Most of them need to be tested in more detail, especially in animal models and if successful, in clinical trials.
Despite the number of plants with recorded ethnobotanical uses against gastrointestinal worms and helminths, no rigorous studies have yet evaluated the activity of most medicinal plants against specific human intestinal worms. Instead, previous research has relied on the use of model organisms as a substitute for these parasites. Most studies have used the free living (non-parasitic) nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a helminth model to represent human intestinal worms. Acorus calamus, Cotyledon orbiculatavar orbiculata, Cyathea dregei, Melia azedarach and Tulbaghia violacea have all been reported to have activity against C. elegans (Aremu et al., 2012). There are also a large number of plants whose anthelmintic activity has been demonstrated under controlled experimentation, either through feeding the whole plant or administering plant extracts to parasitised hosts. However, contrary to traditional expectation, there are also a great number of plants with purported antiparasitic properties, which have not been reproduced under experimental conditions (Ahmed et al., 2013; Adenubi et al., 2016; Aremu, 2009).
Leaves of Nauclea latifolia and roots of Mangifera indica are both important medicinal plants which plays an important role in management of many pathological conditions in developing countries of the world.
This work therefore studies the helminthicidal activities of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract Nauclea latifolia in mice for the control of intestinal helminthes infections owing to the increasing toxicity and resistance to hitherto widely used parasitic infections’ drugs.
Materials And Methods
Preparation of stock solution and various concentrations of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+Root extract of Nauclea latifolia used
100 g of plant root of Nauclea latifolia and 100 g plant leaf of Mangifera indica were weighed and boiled in 2 litres of clean tap water for thirty (30) minutes and allowed to cool. This was freeze dried in freeze dryer machine to turn the liquid recipe into powdery form (Behnke et al., 2001, Adenubi et al., 2016, Ahmed et al., 2013). The powder was placed in universal bottles containing 10 ml sterile distilled water after which they were filtered into a conical flask using a filter paper and a funnel to produce a clear juice. From this mixture of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia, a stock solution was made in universal bottles by adding 0.1 ml of the mixture to 9.9 ml of sterile distilled water followed by
|Weight(mg) of the extract (stock solution) per volume of different concentrations|
|Solution||Solution 1||Solution 2||Solution 3||Solution 4||Solution 5|
|10 ml||100 mg/l||50 mg/l||25 mg/l||12.5 mg/l||0|
Table 1: Various concentrations of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia used.agitation for one minute. From the stock solution 100 mg/l, 50 mg/l, 25 mg/l, 12.5 mg/l dilutions were prepared by fetching 1 ml, 0.5 ml, 0.25 ml, and 0.125 ml and added to six beakers each containing 100 ml of water (Table 1). All concentrations were prepared in duplicates. A control beaker was set up having only water (Aremu et al., 2009, Rufai et al., 2017).
Testing for prevalence of gastro-intestinal parasites in laboratory animals
A total of sixty (60) Swiss albino mice weighing between 105-158 g maintained conventionally were selected randomly from laboratory animal house. The (60) Swiss albino mice were divided into a group of five, resulting in 5 groups labelled G0, G1, G2, G3 and G4. The faeces of each group of mice were collected and examined by parasitological methods for the presence of intestinal parasites before extract was fed to them and prevalence and intensities were noted. The animals were housed and bred in the well-ventilated wooden cages with metal wiring and were fed once daily with commercially formulated rat feed and water was given ad libitum. The research was carried out in accordance with the ethical rules on animals experimentation approved by the ethical committee of Osun State University.
Testing for helminthicidal efficacy of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia
Four of the groups of the mice (G1, G2, G3 and G4) were each treated with 100 mg/l, 50 mg/l, 25 mg/l and 12.5 mg/l of extract except G0 group that was not treated but were given 1 ml of distilled water and serve as the control. After one week of extract application, the faeces of the mice were again collected and examined by parasitological methods. After five days, the prevalence and intensity of gastro-intestinal helminthes among the sampled groups was obtained. The recovered helminthes were examined and counted using the compound microscope. Morphological identification was done using perineal patterns for species identification as described by Bundy et al (1998).
The prevalence and intensities of gastrointestinal helminthes parasites in the sixty (60) Swiss albino mice prior to administration of various concentrations of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia against helminthes is given in Table 1. 42 (70.0%) of the mice under study had parasitic infection with at least one parasite. Seven genera of parasites were detected in the mice, the three of which were protozoa including Entamoeba muris, Eimeria spp. and Cryptosporidium spp., and the four other ones were helminths including Hymenolepis nana, Hymenolepis diminuta, Syphacia muris and Strongyloides ratti. E. muris showed the highest prevalence rate (96%) followed by S. ratti (95%).The lowest prevalence rate was observed in infections with Hymenolepis diminuta and Syphacia muris, all with 2.5% and 2.3% prevalence respectively. Polyparasitic contamination was observed in the sampled mice. 27 (11.7%) of the total samples were contaminated with two species of parasites, while 8 (13.3%) of the samples with three species of parasites and single parasitic contamination were observed 7 (11.7%) (Table 2).
|Variable||No of rats examined||No (%) infected||Number of parasitic spp|
|One (%)||Two (%)||Three (%)|
|G0||12||8 (66.7)||1 (8.3)||5 (41.7)||2 (16.7%)|
|G1||12||7 (58.3)||1 (8.3)||5 (41.7)||1 (8.3%)|
|G2||12||10 (83.3)||2 (16.7)||7 (58.3)||1 (8.3%)|
|G3||12||8 (66.7)||2 (16.7)||4 (33.3)||2 (16.7%)|
|G4||12||9 (75.0)||1 (8.3)||6 (50.0)||2 (16.7%)|
|Male||34||17 (28.3)||4 (11.8)||10 (29.4%)||3 (8.8%)|
|Female||26||25 (41.7)||3 (11.5)||17 (65.4%)||5 (19.2%)|
|Young||30||13 (21.7)||2 (6.7)||8 (26.7%)||3 (10.0%)|
|Adult||30||29 (48.3)||5 (16.7)||19 (63.3%)||5 (16.7%)|
|Overall||60||42 (70.0)||7 (11.7)||27 (45.0%)||8 (13.3%)|
Table 2: The prevalence of intestinal helminthes in the sampled mice before treatment with leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia.
The prevalence of intestinal helminthes parasites in the sampled population in relation to sex of the mice showed that female had higher prevalence rate 25 (41.7%) than male with 17 (28.3%). Percentage infection rates showed that there was statistically significant association between the sexes and prevalence rate. Age specific prevalence of parasites showed that adult mice had the highest prevalence of 29 (48.3%), while the young mice had the least with 13 (21.7%) out of 42 (70.0%) infected (Table 2).
Table 2 showed the result of the antihelminthic activities of various concentrations of the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia against gastrointestinal parasites in the sampled mice. Treatment was observed for 5 days after which prevalence rate was determined. Prevalence rate was seen to have reduced from treatments with higher concentrations to lower concentrations. The highest concentrations of 100 mg/l and 50 mg/l were recorded to have reduced the prevalence rate in G3 from 8 (66.7%) to 0 (0%) and G4, 9 (75.0%) to 0 (0%) while the prevalence in G0 was found to have increased from 8 (66.7%) to 10 (83.3%) (Tables 2 and 3). The intensities of gastrointestinal helminthes in the sampled mice before and after treatment recorded reduction in the intensities of all the parasites (Tables 4 and 5). Statistical analysis using analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant difference in the means of the treatment concentrations and the rates of prevalence of gastrointestinal infections in the sample mice.
|Variable||No of rats examined||No (%) infected||Number of parasitic spp|
|One (%)||Two (%)||Three (%)|
|G0||12||10 (66.7%)||2 (8.3%)||6||2|
Table 3: The prevalence of intestinal helminths in the sampled mice after treatment with leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia.
The results of this research showed that the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia is highly active against intestinal helminths in the sampled mice.
Discussion And Conclusion
Table 4 shows the influence of leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia treatment levels on the prevalence and intensities of gastrointestinal helminthes in the sampled mice. After 5 days after treatments (5DAT), the data revealed that G0 recorded increase in the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthes after treatment (Table 4). This may be attributed to growth in the number of parasites due to no hindrance. Prevalence in G1, G2, G3 and G4 reduced consistently with various concentrations with zero prevalence of helminthes recorded in G3 and G4 (Table 4). This can be attributed to the antihelmintic activities of the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia treatment. Helminthes mortality was recorded to increase gradually from lower concentrations to higher concentrations. The lowest prevalence and intensities of parasites were recorded at 50 mg/l and 100 mg/l concentrations and 50 mg/l as the lethal concentration (LC50) determined from the sample diagnostic doses and diagnostic times for the prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites (Table 5). Statistical analysis using analysis of variance indicated that there was a significant difference in the means of the treatment concentrations and the rates of prevalence of gastrointestinal infections in the sampled mice. The results of this research showed that the leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia are highly active against gastrointestinal parasites in the sampled mice. The extract action also had significant influence (p>0.05) on the time of exposure of mice and the rate of prevalence (Table 5).
|Parasites||Mean of the ova/cysts of the parasite per mice|
|Before Treatment||After Treatment|
Table 4: The intensities of intestinal helminthes in the sampled mice before and after treatment with leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia.
|Extract concentrations||Prevalence of intestinal parasites per group||Diagnostic time (days)|
|0 mg/l||8 (66.7%)||7 (58.3%)||10 (83.3%)||8 (66.7%)||9 (75.0%)||5|
|12.5 mg/l||7 (58.3%)||7 (58.3%)||7 (58.3%)||7 (58.3%)||7 (58.3%)||5|
|25 mg/l||3 (25.0%)||3 (25.0%)||3 (25.0%)||3 (25.0%)||3 (25.0 %)||5|
|50 mg/l||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||5|
|100 mg/l||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||0 (0%)||5|
Table 5: Sample diagnostic doses and diagnostic times for the prevalence of intestinal helminths.
The results of this work showed that leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia is highly active against gastrointestinal helminthes infection. Although there had been practice in some part of the world where leaf extract of Mangifera indica+root extract of Nauclea latifolia was used locally against malarial infection, its efficacy against gastrointestinal helminth parasites that was discovered in this study is recommended for the control of gastro-helminth parasites.
Conflict Of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Rufai Mohammed conceived the study, participated in the study design, data collection, data analysis, and drafted the paper for publication. Akeem Akinboro participated in study design sample collection, laboratory wok, data analysis and interpretation. All authors have read and approved the final copy
The author appreciates the assistance of the technical staff of Zoology laboratory of Osun State University for their cooperation during this study.
- Healthy for Life 20 by 20. American Heart Association 2018.
- Block JP, Gillman MW, Linakis SK, Goldman RE. If it tastes good, I'm drinking it: qualitative study of beverage consumption among college students. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(6):702-6.
- Miketinas D, Cater M, Bailey A, Craft B, Tuuri G. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the Adolescent Motivation to Cook Questionnaire: A Self-Determination Theory instrument. Appetite. 2016;105:527-33.
- Heart Disease Statistics and Maps, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2013.
- Normand MP, Osborne MR. Promoting healthier food choices in college students using individualized dietary feedback. Behav Interv. 2010;25(3):183-90.
- Brown LB, Richards R. Teaching students to cook: an easily incorporated assignment in an academic nutrition course. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(5):355-6.
- Pelletier JE, Laska MN. Balancing healthy meals and busy lives: associations between work, school, and family responsibilities and perceived time constraints among young adults. J Nutr Educ Behav.2012;44(6):481-9.
- Tam R, Yassa B, Parker H, O'Connor H, Allman-Farinelli M. University students' on-campus food purchasing behaviors, preferences, and opinions on food availability. Nutr. 2017;37:7-13.
- Sibylle Kranz PhD RD. College eating 101: factors influencing students' food decisions. International J Child Adolesc Health. 2012;5(1):3.
- Matthews JI, Doerr L, Dworatzek PD. University students intend to eat better but lack coping self-efficacy and knowledge of dietary recommendations. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(1):12-9.