Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2024) Volume 8, Issue 1

Elbow tendon disorders: Surgical interventions and rehabilitation strategies.

Ryan Rosenthal*

Department of Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Ryan Rosenthal
Department of Concord Repatriation, General Hospital, Australia
General Hospital

Received:29-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-126171; Editor assigned:2-Jan-2023, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-126171(PQ); Reviewed:17-Jan-2024, QC No. AAOSR- 24-126171; Revised:22-Jan-2024, Manuscript No.AAOSR- 24-126171 (R); Published:30-Jan-2024, DOI: 10.35841/ aaosr-8.1.187

Citation: Rosenthal R. Elbow tendon disorders: Surgical interventions and rehabilitation strategies..J Ortho Sur Reh.2024; 8(1):187

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation


As a useful diagnostic and therapeutic technique, elbow arthroscopy provides minimally invasive treatment for a variety of elbow problems. The objective of this thorough study is to methodically examine the most current developments in elbow arthroscopy methods, as well as the associated results and applications. Through an amalgamation of extant research and clinical investigations, the study offers an intricate examination of the advancements made in this ever-evolving sector. To find and evaluate developments in elbow arthroscopy, a comprehensive analysis of peer-reviewed literature, clinical studies, and expert opinions was carried out. This includes a range of methods such as synovectomy, osteochondral operations, arthroscopic ligament restoration, and diagnostic arthroscopy.[1].

Critical evaluation was done on pertinent outcomes, including functional improvement, patient satisfaction, and complications. The results of this thorough analysis demonstrate numerous developments in elbow arthroscopy methods. Although it was originally thought to be difficult, arthroscopic ligament restoration has shown significant advancements. Technological advancements in instruments, imaging, and surgical techniques have broadened the application of arthroscopy to include problems like synovial disorders and osteochondral abnormalities. The assessment provides insights into the applications and possible benefits of these breakthroughs by methodically classifying them.The discussion section looks critically at what these developments in elbow arthroscopy mean. The relative efficacy of various methods, implementation difficulties, and the changing role of arthroscopy in the overall care of elbow disease are all taken into account. The dynamic environment of elbow arthroscopy is comprehensively viewed through the exploration of future research directions and the incorporation of developing technology. The reported developments represent a paradigm change in the diagnosis and treatment of elbow problems as elbow arthroscopy continues to advance. [2].

The incorporation of advanced procedures holds promise in augmenting surgical accuracy, diminishing invasiveness, and ameliorating patient consequences. In order to maximise the usefulness of elbow arthroscopy in a variety of clinical circumstances, the review finishes by underlining the clinical importance of these developments and highlighting the necessity of continued research, skill development, and cooperative efforts. Within orthopaedic surgery, elbow arthroscopy has become a dynamic and transformational discipline that provides physicians with a minimally invasive window into the intricacies of the elbow joint. Elbow arthroscopy is now at the forefront of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for a variety of elbow diseases thanks to technical breakthroughs, procedural innovations, and expanded indications over time. This thorough review attempts to methodically investigate and assess new developments in elbow arthroscopy methods, offering an in-depth analysis of their uses and related results. One of the most important joints in the upper limb, the elbow can develop a variety of illnesses, such as degenerative diseases, ligamentous instability, and traumatic injuries.[3].

Conventional surgical methods frequently call for lengthy recovery periods and significant dissection. As a less intrusive option, elbow arthroscopy has grown in popularity due to its capacity to provide detailed visualization, enable precise interventions, and reduce the morbidity associated with traditional open procedures. The justification for this thorough study is the quick development of elbow arthroscopy methods. A rising need exists to consolidate and critically assess these developments as they continue to transform the field of orthopaedic surgery. This study attempts to provide a thorough understanding of the various procedures, their applications, and the results connected with contemporary elbow arthroscopy by synthesising the body of available literature and clinical findings. This review covers a wide range of elbow arthroscopy techniques, such as synovectomy, osteochondral operations, ligament repair, and diagnostic arthroscopy. The main goals are to critically evaluate the published results, examine the therapeutic uses of recent developments, and organise them methodically. By fulfilling these goals, the review hopes to offer insightful information about the condition of elbow arthroscopy today.[4].

Comprehending the subtleties of contemporary developments in elbow arthroscopy is of paramount importance for orthopaedic surgeons, investigators, and healthcare administrators. By providing a consolidated resource that supports clinical decision-making, promotes the adoption of evidence-based practices, and encourages additional research in this quickly developing subject, this review seeks to add to the body of information already in existence. The review will be arranged in a way that will methodically examine several categories of elbow arthroscopy improvements. Every segment will explore particular methods, their subtle procedural aspects, and documented results. The findings will be summarised in the discussion and conclusion that follows, providing a coherent story that reflects the dynamic character of advancements in elbow arthroscopy. The development of less invasive therapeutic methods, such as synovectomy, osteochondral operations, and ligament repair, is indicative of a larger trend. This is a big change from typical open treatments since patients get better postoperative outcomes, shorter recovery times, and less surgical traumata review of the data linked to these developments shows that functional improvement, patient satisfaction, and fewer surgical complications are all positive outcomes.[5].


This research demonstrates that elbow arthroscopy not only offers practical treatments for a range of diseases but also enhances patient satisfaction and quality of life.This thorough assessment has clinical consequences outside of the operation room. The knowledge acquired can be used by researchers, surgeons, and healthcare decision-makers to improve training methods, direct future research projects, and influence surgical decision-making. In the end, these advancements have the potential to shape the standard of care in elbow surgery. In summary, "Advancements in Elbow Arthroscopy" captures the essence of advancement in orthopaedic surgery, where patient-centered care and innovation come together. By embracing these developments, the orthopaedic community will be better equipped to traverse the changing field of elbow arthroscopy and provide patients with elbow diseases with optimised care and improved results. The review's synthesis of the available data adds to the continuing conversation by encouraging a culture of excellence and innovation in the search for better musculoskeletal treatment.



  1. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, et al. American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. JJ Am Coll Surg. 2017 ;224(1):59-74.
  2.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  3. Li GQ, Guo FF, Ou Y, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of surgical site infections following orthopedic surgery. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(12):1268-71.
  4.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  5. Liu X, Dong Z, Li J, et al. Factors affecting the incidence of surgical site infection after geriatric hip fracture surgery: A retrospective multicenter study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1-9.
  6.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  7. Shao J, Zhang H, Yin B, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Surg J. 2018;56:124-32.
  8.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  9. Momaya AM, Hlavacek J, Etier B, et al. Risk factors for infection after operative fixation of Tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2016;47(7):1501-5.
  10.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  11. Colman M, Wright A, Gruen G, et al. Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2013;44(2):249-52
  12.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  13. Silverberg ND, Iaccarino MA, Panenka WJ, et al. Management of concussion and mild traumatic brain injury: a synthesis of practice guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(2):382-93.
  14.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  15. Sheridan E, Wiseman JM, Malik AT, et al. The role of sociodemographics in the occurrence of orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2019;50(7):1288-92.
  16.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  17. McKissack HM, Viner GC, McMurtrie JT, et al. Does insurance status affect access to care among ankle fracture patients? An institutional retrospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 ;60(3):520-2.
  18.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

  19. Beiter K, Danos D, Conrad E, et al. PTSD treatment reduces risk of trauma recidivism in a diverse community at a safety-net hospital: A propensity score analysis of data from a level one trauma center. Injury.2022;53(7):2493-500.
  20.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross ref

Get the App