Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Opinion Article - Journal of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Research (2025) Volume 10, Issue 4

Cognitive and Motor Network Reorganization Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adult Patients

Samuel Okoye*

Department of Neurophysiology, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

*Corresponding Author:
Samuel Okoye
Department of Neurophysiology
University of Lagos, Nigeria
E-mail: s.okoye@unilag.edu.ng

Received: 03-Oct-2025, Manuscript No. JNNR-25-171944; Editor assigned: 04-Oct-2025, PreQC No. JNNR-25-1719445(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Oct-2025, QC No JNNR-25-1719445; Revised: 21-Oct-2025, Manuscript No. JNNR-25-1719445(R); Published: 28-Oct-2025, DOI:10.35841/ aajnnr -10.4.272

Citation: Okoye S. Cognitive and motor network reorganization following traumatic brain injury in adult patients. J Neurol Neurorehab Res. 2025;10(4):272.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant global health challenge, with long-term consequences on cognitive, motor, and behavioral functions. Damage to cortical and subcortical structures disrupts established neural networks, impairing attention, memory, and motor control. Recovery following TBI is influenced by both the severity of injury and the brain’s inherent capacity for neuroplasticity. Recent research highlights the dynamic interplay between local synaptic repair and large-scale network reorganization, suggesting that effective rehabilitation should target both cognitive and motor domains to facilitate integrated recovery [1].

Post-TBI neuroplasticity involves functional and structural adaptations within surviving neural circuits. Cortical areas adjacent to the lesion often assume functions lost due to neuronal death, while contralateral homologous regions may participate in compensatory mechanisms. Electrophysiological studies have demonstrated increased connectivity between spared motor networks, correlating with improved motor performance in rehabilitated patients. Cognitive recovery similarly depends on reinforcement of residual networks through targeted training and environmental enrichment, which stimulate synaptic remodeling and strengthen task-relevant pathways [2].

Neurorehabilitation strategies increasingly leverage this knowledge to optimize recovery. Task-specific therapy, repetitive motor training, and cognitive exercises enhance activity-dependent plasticity, promoting network integration. Advances in technology, including virtual reality (VR) and robotic-assisted devices, enable intensive, personalized training while providing real-time feedback. These interventions not only stimulate relevant neural circuits but also maintain patient motivation, a critical determinant of neurorehabilitation success. Moreover, early intervention is crucial, as the brain exhibits heightened plasticity during the initial post-injury period [3].

Pharmacological approaches complement behavioral interventions by modulating neurotransmitter systems critical to learning and plasticity. Agents targeting dopaminergic, cholinergic, or glutamatergic pathways can enhance synaptic potentiation, facilitating cognitive and motor improvements. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), further augment recovery by promoting cortical excitability and network reorganization. These multimodal strategies highlight the importance of integrating biological, technological, and behavioral interventions for effective TBI rehabilitation [4].

Challenges in TBI recovery include inter-individual variability in injury patterns, comorbidities, and responsiveness to therapy. Tailoring interventions to patient-specific neural profiles, continuously monitoring progress, and adjusting therapy accordingly are essential for optimizing outcomes. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies integrating neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and functional assessments to refine rehabilitation protocols. Such integrative approaches promise to improve both functional independence and quality of life for TBI survivors [5].

Conclusion

Cognitive and motor network reorganization is central to recovery following traumatic brain injury. By combining targeted rehabilitation, pharmacological modulation, and neuromodulatory technologies, clinicians can enhance neuroplasticity and functional restoration. Personalized, integrative approaches that address both cognitive and motor domains offer the greatest potential for improving long-term outcomes and patient quality of life.

References

  1. Sun C, Shen L, Zhang Z, et al. Therapeutic strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an update. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(8):837.

    2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  2. Salmaninejad A, Jafari Abarghan Y, Bozorg Qomi S, et al. Common therapeutic advances for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Int J Neurosci. 2021;131(4):370-89.

    3. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  3. Mbakam CH, Lamothe G, Tremblay G, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurotherapeutics. 2022;19(3):931-41.

    4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  4. Bez Batti Angulski A, Hosny N, Cohen H, et al. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Disease mechanism and therapeutic strategies. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1183101.

    5. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Takeda SI, Clemens PR, Hoffman EP. Exon-skipping in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021;8(2):343-58.

    6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Get the App