Mini Review - Neurophysiology Research (2025) Volume 7, Issue 1

An Integrative Model of Synaptic Plasticity and Memory Consolidation in the Human Hippocampus

Department of Neurophysiology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

*Corresponding Author:

Maria González
Department of Neurophysiology
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
E-mail: m.gonzález@universidad.edu

Received: 03-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AANR-25-169338; Editor assigned: 04-Jan-2025, PreQC No. AANR-25-1693385(PQ); Reviewed: 18-Jan-2025, QC No AANR-25-1693385; Revised: 21-Jan-2025, Manuscript No. AANR-25-1693385(R); Published: 28-Jan-2025, DOI:10.35841/aanr -7.1.181

Citation: González M. An integrative model of synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation in the human hippocampus. Neurophysiol Res. 2025;7(1):181.

Introduction

Understanding the complex relationship between synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation has been a central focus of neuroscience research for decades. The human hippocampus, with its intricate network of neurons and layered architecture, plays a crucial role in encoding, storing, and retrieving episodic and spatial memories. Synaptic plasticity—the ability of synapses to strengthen or weaken over time—is widely accepted as the cellular substrate of learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), the primary forms of synaptic plasticity, have been extensively studied in hippocampal circuits, especially in the CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus regions. Theoretical and experimental models suggest that these synaptic changes are not only localized but also interact dynamically across different hippocampal subfields, forming the basis for memory traces that can be consolidated and retrieved later. This article explores an integrative framework that combines molecular, cellular, and systems-level processes to elucidate how synaptic plasticity contributes to memory consolidation in the human hippocampus [1].

LTP is initiated by high-frequency stimulation of synapses and involves the activation of NMDA receptors, leading to a cascade of intracellular events such as calcium influx, activation of protein kinases, and insertion of AMPA receptors into the postsynaptic membrane. These changes result in a sustained increase in synaptic strength, thought to underlie the encoding of new memories. On the other hand, LTD is induced by low-frequency stimulation and leads to the removal of AMPA receptors, thereby weakening synaptic transmission. While LTP encodes the strengthening of important synaptic connections, LTD is believed to eliminate redundant or irrelevant information, thus refining neural circuits for optimal memory storage. Both processes are modulated by a variety of signaling molecules, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), dopamine, and endocannabinoids. Their intricate regulation allows for synaptic specificity and input selectivity, ensuring that only relevant neural patterns are reinforced while others are pruned. These activity-dependent changes in synaptic strength provide the neural flexibility needed to adapt to novel experiences and environmental demands [2].

Beyond the synaptic level, memory consolidation involves the integration of newly acquired information with pre-existing knowledge networks. This process occurs during both wakefulness and sleep, but it is especially pronounced during slow-wave sleep, where coordinated hippocampal-neocortical interactions play a pivotal role. During this time, hippocampal sharp-wave ripples (SWRs) and neocortical spindles are temporally coupled, facilitating the transfer of reactivated memory traces from the hippocampus to long-term storage sites in the cortex. This transfer is thought to involve the replay of neuronal firing sequences that occurred during initial encoding, a phenomenon that has been observed in both animal models and human studies. Synaptic plasticity mechanisms such as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) further refine this process by strengthening synapses based on the timing of pre- and postsynaptic spikes. These mechanisms collectively support a systems-level consolidation framework where memories are initially stored in a hippocampal-dependent form and gradually become hippocampal-independent over time [3].

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of structural plasticity—such as dendritic spine remodeling and axonal sprouting—in addition to functional plasticity. Changes in spine morphology, including spine enlargement and increased synapse density, have been observed following memory-related tasks. These morphological adaptations are mediated by cytoskeletal remodeling proteins and are sustained over longer periods, suggesting their role in long-term memory stabilization. Importantly, structural plasticity is also subject to regulation by intrinsic factors such as gene expression and epigenetic modifications. Transcription factors like CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) play a key role in translating transient synaptic signals into long-lasting changes by upregulating genes involved in synapse growth and maintenance. Moreover, non-coding RNAs and histone modifications have emerged as additional layers of control that influence the persistence and fidelity of memory traces. This multilayered plasticity—combining biochemical, structural, and epigenetic components—adds robustness to the memory consolidation process, ensuring that salient experiences leave a lasting imprint on the brain [4].

Computational and neuroimaging models have begun to integrate these molecular and cellular insights into large-scale brain network dynamics. Functional MRI studies have revealed that memory encoding and retrieval involve dynamic interactions between the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, with task-related increases in functional connectivity correlating with better memory performance. Meanwhile, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography have identified structural pathways that support efficient hippocampal-cortical communication. Computational models based on Hebbian and Bayesian frameworks simulate how synaptic weights evolve over time in response to repeated stimuli and how memory representations become more stable with consolidation. These models help bridge the gap between synaptic changes and observable behavior, offering testable predictions about the conditions under which memory enhancement or impairment occurs. As a result, an integrative model of synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation not only advances theoretical understanding but also has practical implications for treating memory-related disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, PTSD, and age-related cognitive decline [5].

Conclusion

The human hippocampus serves as a critical hub for the encoding and consolidation of memories through a complex interplay of synaptic plasticity, structural remodeling, and interregional communication. By integrating findings from molecular biology, electrophysiology, neuroimaging, and computational modeling, researchers are beginning to construct a cohesive framework that explains how transient experiences are transformed into stable, long-term memories. Synaptic mechanisms such as LTP and LTD lay the foundation for this transformation, while systems-level interactions during sleep and rest facilitate the redistribution and integration of memory traces. Structural changes and gene regulation further reinforce these processes, ensuring memory durability and accessibility. As neuroscience continues to unravel these mechanisms, the development of targeted interventions to enhance memory or mitigate its decline becomes increasingly feasible. The synthesis of diverse lines of evidence into a unified model of memory consolidation exemplifies the power of interdisciplinary research in addressing one of the most fundamental questions in neuroscience.

References

1. Horwitz B, Tagamets MA, McIntosh AR.Neural modelling, functional brain imaging and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999;3(3):91-8.

Google Scholar

2. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1):S103-9.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. McIntosh AR.Mapping cognition to the brain through neural interactions. Memory. 1999;7(5-6):523-48.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Moll J, Zahn R, de Oliveira-Souza R, et al. The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6(10):799-809.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Ralph MA, Jefferies E, Patterson K, et al.The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(1):42-55.

Indexed at, Google ScholarCrossref