Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Perspective - Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (2025) Volume 9, Issue 1

Advancements and Advantages of Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery

Tewab Hayman*

Suzuki Toshiaki

*Corresponding Author:
Tewab Hayman
Department of Pediatrics,
College of Health Sciences
Nigeria
E-mail:haymanotwae@gmail.com

Received:01-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-161850;Editor assigned:02-Jan-2024, PreQC No. AAOSR-24-161850(PQ); Reviewed:15-Jan-2024, QC No. AAOSR-24-161850; Revised:20-Jan-2024, Manuscript No. AAOSR-24-161850 (R); Published:27-Jan-2024, DOI: 10.35841/ aaosr-9.1.241

Citation: Nigeria

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Introduction

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has revolutionized the field of musculoskeletal treatment, offering patients faster recovery times, reduced pain, and improved overall outcomes. This advanced surgical approach utilizes smaller incisions, specialized instruments, and cutting-edge technology to minimize trauma to surrounding tissues while ensuring precise and effective treatment. As the demand for less invasive procedures continues to rise, orthopedic surgeons are increasingly adopting these techniques for various conditions, including joint replacements, spinal surgeries, and fracture repairs.One of the most significant advantages of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is the reduction in post-operative pain. Traditional open surgeries often require large incisions, leading to extensive soft tissue damage, prolonged pain, and longer rehabilitation periods. In contrast, minimally invasive procedures use small incisions, resulting in less disruption to muscles, ligaments, and nerves. This minimizes pain levels, decreases the need for opioid pain management, and enhances patient comfort during recovery. [1,2].

 

Faster recovery times are another key benefit of minimally invasive techniques. Because these procedures cause less trauma to the body, patients often experience shorter hospital stays and can return to their daily activities more quickly. Many minimally invasive surgeries are performed on an outpatient basis, allowing individuals to recover at home rather than spending extended periods in a hospital setting. Additionally, the reduced healing time contributes to a lower risk of complications, such as infections and blood clots, which are more common in traditional open surgeries.Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery has also been associated with improved cosmetic outcomes. Large surgical scars from traditional procedures can be a concern for many patients, particularly those undergoing surgeries on visible areas such as the knee or shoulder. With smaller incisions, scarring is significantly reduced, enhancing the overall aesthetic result and boosting patient confidence post-surgery. [3,4].

Another crucial aspect of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery is the use of advanced imaging technology. Surgeons rely on real-time imaging techniques, such as fluoroscopy, arthroscopy, and robotic-assisted navigation, to enhance precision and accuracy during procedures. These technologies enable surgeons to visualize the affected area in greater detail, allowing for more precise placement of implants, better alignment of bones, and reduced risk of complications. Robotics and computer-assisted navigation have further refined these procedures, enabling highly customized treatment plans tailored to each patient’s unique anatomy.Joint replacement surgeries, such as total knee and hip replacements, have greatly benefited from minimally invasive techniques. Traditional joint replacement surgeries require large incisions and significant disruption to surrounding muscles, leading to lengthy recovery times. Minimally invasive joint replacement procedures involve smaller incisions, muscle-sparing techniques, and improved implant positioning, resulting in faster rehabilitation and improved long-term function. Patients undergoing minimally invasive joint replacements often experience less pain, regain mobility more quickly, and have a lower risk of complications compared to traditional methods. [5,6].

 

Spinal surgeries have also seen remarkable advancements due to minimally invasive techniques. Conditions such as herniated discs, spinal stenosis, and degenerative disc disease can now be treated with smaller incisions and specialized instrumentation, educing damage to surrounding tissues and preserving spinal stability. Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) allows for a quicker return to normal activities, less post-operative pain, and a reduced risk of infection. Techniques such as endoscopic spine surgery and percutaneous spinal fusion have further enhanced the ability to treat spinal conditions with minimal disruption.Sports injuries and orthopedic trauma cases have also benefited from minimally invasive approaches. Athletes and active individuals often require fast recovery times to return to their sports or daily routines. [7,8].

Arthroscopic surgery, a common minimally invasive technique, is widely used for treating injuries such as ACL tears, rotator cuff injuries, and meniscus tears. This technique involves inserting a small camera and instruments through tiny incisions, allowing surgeons to diagnose and treat injuries with minimal damage to surrounding structures. The benefits include quicker rehabilitation, reduced scarring, and improved joint function.Despite the many advantages of minimally invasive orthopedic surgery, it is important to recognize that not all patients are candidates for these procedures. Factors such as the severity of the condition, patient anatomy, and the surgeon’s expertise play a crucial role in determining the most appropriate treatment approach. While minimally invasive techniques offer numerous benefits, they require specialized training and expertise to ensure optimal outcomes. Surgeons must undergo extensive training to master these advanced procedures and stay updated on the latest technological advancements. [9,10].

Conclusion

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgery continue to push the boundaries of what is possible in musculoskeletal treatment. The integration of robotic-assisted surgery, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality in orthopedic procedures is expected to enhance precision, improve patient outcomes, and further reduce recovery times. Additionally, advancements in biologic therapies, such as stem cell treatments and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, are being explored to complement minimally invasive techniques and promote tissue regeneration

References

  1. Rueben S, Conely N. Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000; 91(5):1221-5.
  2. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  3. Schiodt FV, Rochling FA, Casey DL, et al. Acetaminophen toxicity in an urban county hospital. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337:1112-7.
  4. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  5. Gillings D, Koch G. The application of the principle of intention-to-treat to the analysis of clinical trials. Drug Information J. 1991;25:411-24.
  6. Google ScholarCross Ref

  7. Delbos A, Boccard E. The morphine-sparing effect of propacetamol in orthopaedic postoperative pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995; 10:279-86.
  8. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  9. Schmidt ML. Rutteman GR. Wolvekamp PT, et al. Clinical and radiographic manifestations of canine malignant histiocytosis.Vet Q. 1993;15:117-20.
  10. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  11. Seiler RJ, Wilkinson GT. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma involving the ileum in a cat. Vet Pathol. 1980;17:513-17.
  12. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  13. Krueger H, Noonan VK, Trenaman LM. The economic burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada.Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013;33:113-22.
  14. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  15. Cadotte DW, Fehlings MG. Spinal cord injury: A systematic review of current treatment options.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:732-41.
  16. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  17. Pereira JR, Valle AL, Shiratori FK, et al. Influence of intraradicular post and crown ferrule on the fracture strength of endodontic ally treated teeth. Braz Dent J. 2009;20:297-302.
  18. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

  19. Mohammed K, Potier L, François, Dardari D,et al. The evaluation of off-loading using a new removable orthotics in Diabetic foot (ORTHODIAB) randomized controlled trial: Study design and rational. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016; 9-34.
  20. Indexed atGoogle ScholarCross Ref

Get the App