Current Trends in Cardiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.
Reach Us +1 (202) 780-3397

Mini Review - Current Trends in Cardiology (2022) Volume 6, Issue 6

A brief note on Ventricular Tachycardia.

John Robinson*

Department of Human Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA

Corresponding Author:
John Robinson
Department of Human Genetics
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA

Received: 03-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AACC-22-82268; Editor assigned: 05-Nov-2022, Pre QC No. AACC-22-82268(PQ); Reviewed:21-Nov-2022, QC No AACC-22-82268; Revised: 23-Nov-2022, Manuscript No. AACC-22-82268(R); Published: 30-Nov-2022, DOI:10.35841/aacc-6.6.127

Citation:Robinson J. A brief note on ventricular tachycardia. Curr Trend Cardiol. 2022;6(6):127

Visit for more related articles at Current Trends in Cardiology


Ventricular tachycardia is described as a wide intricate tachyarrhythmia. It is characterized by length as non-supported or maintained. Non-supported ventricular tachycardia endures under 30 seconds and presents with tachyarrhythmia with multiple beats of ventricular beginning. At the point when the beat endures longer than 30 seconds or hemodynamic flimsiness happens in under 30 seconds, it is viewed as supported ventricular tachycardia. This movement audits the assessment and the executives of ventricular tachycardia and features the job of interprofessional colleagues in teaming up to give all around composed care and improve results for impacted patients.

Ventricular tachycardia is portrayed as a wide complicated (QRS span more prominent than 120 milliseconds) tachyarrhythmia at a pulse more noteworthy than 100 beats each moment. It is grouped by term as non-maintained or supported. Non-supported ventricular tachycardia is characterized as multiple beats of ventricular beginning at a rate more noteworthy than 100 beats each moment that endures less than 30 seconds in length. At the point when the cadence endures longer than 30 seconds or hemodynamic flimsiness happens in less than 30 seconds, it is viewed as supported ventricular tachycardia [1].

Further arrangement is made into monomorphic and polymorphic based on QRS morphology. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia exhibits a stable QRS morphology from one beat to another while polymorphic ventricular tachycardia has changing or diverse QRS fluctuation from one beat to another. Torsades de pointes is a polymorphic ventricular tachycardia that happens in the setting of a long QT span and shows up as endlessly waxing QRS plentifulness on ECG. The last type of ventricular tachycardia is bidirectional ventricular tachycardia which has a beat-to-beat rotation in the QRS front facing plane pivot. It is related with digitalis poisonousness or catecholaminergic polymorphic VT. The most well-known reason for VT is ischemic coronary illness [2].


Asymptomatic patients with non-supported ventricular tachycardia (VT) and no hidden heart comorbidities require no extra treatment. Patients that are suggestive and without cardiovascular comorbidities ought to be begun a beta-blocker because of great viability and security profile. In the event that these patients keep on having episodes of non-supported VT in spite of beta-blocker treatment, or can't endure beta-blocker treatment, a calcium channel with atrioventricular nodal activity, for example, verapamil or diltiazem can be utilized. The recently referenced nondihydropyridine calcium divert blockers are contraindicated in the setting of underlying coronary illness or cardiovascular breakdown with diminished launch part [3].

Patients with supported monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) that are temperamental ought to be overseen following high level heart life support (leg tendons) rules. Hemodynamically stable patients ought to be pharmacologically cardioverted utilizing an enemy of arrhythmic drug. Intravenous amiodarone or procainamide can be utilized for this reason. Procainamide will end somewhere in the range of half and 80% of ventricular tachycardias, and it will slow the conduction of those that it doesn't end. Amiodarone will change over around 30% of patients to sinus beat however is exceptionally powerful in lessening the inversion pace of headstrong SMVT.

The first-line treatment for persistent treatment of patients with ischemic coronary illness and VT is a beta-blocker treatment which is related with a decreased gamble of unexpected heart demise. In patients with ischemic coronary illness who have repetitive VT notwithstanding beta-blocker treatment, amiodarone or sotalol can be started anyway neither one of the treatments has been related with a reduction in mortality. Amiodarone in addition to a beta-blocker has been related with a more prominent diminishing in the quantity of ICD shocks contrasted with sotalol monotherapy.

Patients with ischemic coronary illness that endure abrupt heart failure because of ventricular tachycardia, or experience hemodynamically unsound or stable supported ventricular tachycardia, ought to have an implantable cardiovascular defibrillator (ICD) put assuming their assessed significant endurance is more prominent than 1 year. Patients with syncope who have ischemic cardiomyopathy, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, or grown-up inherent coronary illness who don't meet rules for an ICD can go through an electrophysiological study to evaluate the gamble of supported ventricular tachycardia; in any case, playing out the concentrate exclusively for risk delineation isn't demonstrated. Catheter removal has a class 1 suggestion for patients with a background marked by myocardial localized necrosis that keep on experiencing indicative supported VT, or have fizzled or are prejudiced of amiodarone or other antiarrhythmic prescriptions [4].


  1. Lloyd EA, Zipes DP, Heger JJ, et al. Sustained ventricular tachycardia due to bundle branch reentry. Am Heart J. 1982;104(5):1095-7.
  2. Indexed atGoogle Scholar, CrossRef

  3. Caceres J, Jazayeri M, McKinnie J, et al. Sustained bundle branch reentry as a mechanism of clinical tachycardia. Circulation. 1989;79(2):256-70.
  4.  Indexed at, Google Scholar, CrossRef

  5. Cohen TJ, Chien WW, Lurie KG, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for treatment of bundle branch reentrant ventricular tachycardia: results and long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(7):1767-73.
  6.  Indexed atGoogle Scholar, CrossRef

  7. Tchou P, Jazayeri M, Denker S, et al. Transcatheter electrical ablation of right bundle branch. A method of treating macroreentrant ventricular tachycardia attributed to bundle branch reentry Circulation. 1988;78(2):246-57.
  8. Indexed atGoogle Scholar, CrossRef

Get the App