Previous Page  23 / 23
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 23
Page Background

Page 62

Notes:

allied

academies

Journal of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics | Volume: 3

July 23-25, 2018 | Moscow, Russia

12

th

World Cancer Congress

Proposal of a Nutritional Screening for Malnutrition in GI tract Cancer patients under surgery

Ricardo Terminel Zaragoza, Parada-Flores OA, Ramos E

and

Rivera-Perez MA

Health Sciences Department,Mexico

Introduction:

Limited resources force hospitals from relying

on nutrition screening tools to identify malnutrition patients.

The Nutritional Control Index (CONUT) increased attention in

the nutritional screening and assessment is due to its simple

and automatized method of three parameters: lymphocytes,

cholesterol and albumin. There is an ongoing debate regarding

the value of albumin as a clinical marker of malnutrition, because

it’saffectedbysystemicinflammation,commoningastrointestinal

cancerpatients.Theobjectiveofthisstudyistoproposeanutritional

screening tool for detecting malnutrition in these patients.

Methods:

This is a randomized, single-blinded, case control

study done in the Mexican Institute for Social Security. An

established number of 50 patients with GI cancer, an output

of <500mL/d and surgery candidates undergo prospective

random assignment to CONUT (n=25, control group) or

IMSS Score (n=25, study group). Weight, cholesterol and

lymphocytes were measured in both groups, with only

difference of albumin for control, and total proteins for study

group, pre and post-surgery (4 days after). Outcome variables

include preoperative and postoperative nutritional status.

Results:

CONUT and IMSS score effectively detected

malnutrition. The pre-operative study group score showed less

cases of moderate malnutrition proved by mean reduction

(mean: 5.2 ± 0.1959) than the control group (mean: 7.52 ±

0.2917) and statistical significance (p<0.0062, r: 0.9629). The

post-operative study group got only moderate malnutrition

cases (mean: 6.8 ±0.1512), while the control group got mixed

several and moderate malnutrition (mean: 9.96± 0.2813),

having the most statistical difference (p<0.0001, r: 0.8886).

Conclusion:

IMSS score was able to significantly provide a

nutritionalstatusinGIcancerpatients,thisstudycouldbeafirststep

for a novel nutritional screening. However, further studies should

be done in more heterogeneous populations and larger sample

s

e:

drritom@gmail.com