Biomedical Research

Journal Banner

Comparison of functional training and strength training in improving knee extension lag after first four weeks of total knee replacement

Maryam Shabbir1, Bilal Umar2, Sarah Ehsan3*, Sunaina Munir4, Umoal Bunin5 and Khurram Sarfraz6

1Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan

2Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan

3Department of Physical Therapy, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan

4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

5Department of Physical Therapy, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

6Ali Hospital, Sahlimar Link Road, Lahore, Pakistan

*Corresponding Author:
Sarah Ehsan
Department of Physical Therapy
Superior University
Lahore, Pakistan

Accepted on May 08, 2017

Visit for more related articles at Biomedical Research

Abstract

The weakness of quadriceps and reduced activation has been identified as a major cause of activity limitations post Total knee replacement (TKR). There is a need to evaluate various available techniques in their effectiveness in improving quadriceps strength and minimizing functional limitations after total knee replacement. Objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of strength training as compared to functional training in improving knee extension lag after first four weeks of Total Knee Replacement. This Randomized control trial was conducted at Ghurki trust teaching hospital, from June to December 2015.Patients with total knee replacement were selected consecutively and then randomly assigned to control group (n=33) and treatment group (n=31). Primary and secondary outcome measures were goniometry and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) respectively. There was no significant difference found in knee extension Lag between the two groups (p-value>0.05). The mean Value for pain on visual analogue scale was 1.78 (SD=3.03) for control group and 1.33 (SD=3.32) for treatment group. The difference in mean scores for pain was significantly different for both groups (pvalue< 0.05). Both strength training and functional training were found equally effective in improving quadriceps lag, however, functional training exercises resulted in significant reduction in post-operative knee pain compare to resistance training. It is recommended to make functional exercises an essential part of physical rehabilitation post total knee replacement.

Keywords

Arthroplasty, Exercise therapy, Knee joint, pain, Outcome assessment, Resistance training, Visual analogue scale.

Introduction

Overview

An estimated number of almost over 650,000 total knee replacement surgeries were done in United States in the year 2010 and by 2030 this number is expected to increase to 3.5 million [1]. Total knee arthroplasty is performed in order to ensure long term pain relief and improve patient satisfaction. However, many patients post-TKR have reported persistent impairments and functional limitations as compared to their age-matched controls [2]. Despite of the fact that arthritis related pain goes away after a knee replacement, the strength deficits in hip and knee musculature pose problems for the patients leading to functional limitations [3]. The weakness and delayed activation of quadriceps have been identified as the major cause of activity limitations post TKR [3,4]. The post-operative Quadriceps strength has been found to be reduced to as much as 60% as compared the pre operated strength. Therefore Quadriceps activation is an important consideration for rehabilitation following a total knee arthoplasty [4]. Previous studies have shown the impact of different postoperative rehabilitation strategies as resistance exercises, weight bearing functional exercises, low and high impact sports activities, proprioceptive and balance training. [5-9]. However, there is a need to develop evidence based practice guidelines. Balance training along with traditional functional training has shown positive effects on the functional recovery after total knee replacement [6]. There is an increasing trend of pre-operative and post-operative outpatient Rehabilitation for total knee replacement. [10]. The persistent quadriceps weakness and the resulting functional limitations after TKR are attributed to ineffective post-operative rehabilitation approaches. A universally accepted protocol for post-operative rehabilitation for total knee replacement is lacking. A recent study on the post-operative care after TKR has revealed that 26% patients get the out-patient based physical rehabilitation after their discharge which can have profound effects on the long term well-being and quality of life of the patients [11].

Strength training with high resistance has been shown to improve quadriceps strength and activation [4]. Progressive strength training has been proposed to be started as early as 1 to 2 days post op in order to minimize strength deficits in quadriceps [12]. Small to moderate improvements in range of motion and functional status have been observed with functional exercise after 3-4 months of total knee replacement. Home based unsupervised exercises have also been speculated to reduce pain and disability. But the efficacy of home base exercises and functional exercises in providing long term improvements in range of motion and functional status is unclear [13]. Therefore there is a need to evaluate the effectiveness of various techniques in improving quadriceps strength and minimizing functional limitations after total knee replacement. Current study hypothesized that functional training program is more effective as compared to conventional strength training in reducing quadriceps lag after total knee replacement.

Objective

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of strength training as compared to functional training in improving knee extension lag after first four weeks of Total Knee Replacement.

Material and Methods

Methods

It was a Randomized Controlled Trial conducted with 4 weeks follow up. Patients in control group were given strength training and those in treatment group were given functional training. So the primary variables of study were strengthening exercises given as outpatient basis and strengthening through functional activities given as home plan. The details of these variables are mentioned in next section under the heading “Intervention”. The subjects were selected through purposive sampling technique and then randomly allocated to either control or experimental group by using lottery method. The allocation process was concealed and was performed by a research assistant who was not involved in any further step of research (Figure 1).

biomedres-intervention-allocation

Figure 1. Flow chart showing enrollment, intervention allocation, and follow-up of the patients.

Patients

Participants were taken from the list of patients that were waiting for Total Knee Replacement. Patients who met following eligibility criteria were selected: (1) diagnosed with Osteoarthritis of Knee (2) having first TKR surgery, (3) having post-operative goal to ambulate with or without walking aids (4) willing to undertake physical therapy interventions and follow up. Patients for whom total knee arthroplasty was indicated due traumatic knee injury, rheumatoid arthritis or bone tumors were excluded. Of the 4 surgeons involved in the study, 2 were high volume knee replacement surgeons (Defined as more than 80 Total Knee Replacement Surgeries) and 2 surgeons were low volume surgeons. Patients from high and low volume surgeons were evenly divided in 2 groups.

Sample size

Sample of 64 patients was taken consecutively.

Blinding

Treatment protocols were managed to hide from patients and assessors. Clinicians, however, had the idea of treatment approach to particular groups. This double blinding was maintained throughout course of trial. Outcome assessment was blinded and carried out by Physical Therapists who were not involved in intervention tasks. This physical therapist was trained in using outcome measures especially the primary one in this study i.e. Goniometer. Assessor physical therapist and patients were blinded from the mode of treatment.

Interventions

Control group received muscle strengthening program once per day for 5 days a week. It consisted of ankle cuff weights. Different weight sandbags were used for this purpose. Patients were demonstrated the procedure and the methods were observed by experienced physical therapist. Treatment group was given functional activities. Functional activities included squats, lunges and steps (step up, step down).

Functional activities were demonstrated to the treatment group by trained physical therapists. Patients were observed while performing those functional activities. They were provided with illustrated pamphlet of exercises as a home exercise plan.

Primary outcome measure was Goniometry. The range of knee joint was measured through same procedures. While Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used as secondary outcome measure to measure pain level [14].

Statistical calculations and analysis

Analysis was based on “intention to treat” basis. Means, medians, standard deviations were generated for major variables of study. The data was analyzed through SPSS 20.0. Paired sample t-test was used and the change in knee extension lag and pain level were measured at different levels of follow up, because improvement in quadriceps lag was primary outcome and improvement in pain was major secondary outcome of trial.

Ethical approval and data storage

Ethical approval was obtained and stored according to data protection and storage act [6].

Results

Sixty four subjects participated in the study. Subjects were similar in both groups in their demographic characteristics (Table 1) and were also same at base line measurements of all out come measures (Table 2). Total 64 patients (30 patients in treatment group and 31 patients in control group) followed up for 4 weeks post operatively. The average values of Quadriceps Lag on Baseline for control group and treatment group were 4.44 (SD=4.93) and 7.33 (SD=9.01) respectively. At 2nd measurement after two weeks for the mean values for control group and treatment group were 4.89 (SD=4.86) and 4.11 (SD=4.49) respectively. Final value measurement taken at end of 4th week was Mean=1.67 (SD=3.04) for control group and for treatment group it was Mean=1.33 (SD=3.32).The p-value at final measurement was 0.77 (Table 3).

Demographics Treatment Group
n=31 Mean(SD)
Control Group
n=33 Mean(SD)
p-value
Age, Years 60 (10) 71 (12) 0.69
Body Mass Index 32 (6) 31 (5) 0.40
Female, n (%) 39 (60) 33 (50) 0.29
Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis, n (%) 63 (96) 64 (97) 0.51
No Co Morbid Condition, n (%) 28 (70) 22 (55) 0.36
>1 joint with osteoarthritis 33 (51) 38 (58) 0.73
High Volume Surgeon* 43 (78) 48 (80) 0.82
Patella Resurfaced** 28 (51) 32 (53) 0.85
Independent t test, Chi-square test
*High Volume Surgeons defined who has done more than 80 Total Knee Replacement Surgeries in their career.
**TKR in which surgeon applied a separate piece on backside of patella to smoothen its movements on implant.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of treatment and control groups demographics and surgical intervention.

  Treatment  Group
n=30 Mean(SD)
Control  Group
n=31 Mean(SD)
WOMAC pain 48 (15) 49 (20)
WOMAC function 48 (17) 50 (19)
Taking drugs to relieve pain 39 (75) 43 (79)
Impairment in other lower limb joints 37 (71) 34 (62)
Co-Morbidities
Cardiac Disease 5 (10) 8 (15)
Chronic Pulmonary Disease 2 (4) 1 (2)
Hypertension 28 (54) 31 (57)
Diabetes 9 (17) 13 (24)
Kidney Disease 3 (6) 1 (2)
Neurologic Disease 0 (0) 1 (2)
Strength of Quadriceps 23 (12) 24 (11)
SF-Bodily Pain 39 (17) 38 (117)
SF-Mental Health 73 (16) 74 (16)
SF-Social Function 68 (28) 67 (27)
SF-Role Emotional 66 (39) 60 (43)

Table 2. Baseline measurements of treatment and control groups on WOMAC pain, WOMAC function, Taking pain relieving drugs, Impairment in lower limb, Co-Morbidities, Quadriceps strength, SF bodily pain, Social health, mental health and Role function.

  Control group (n=31) Treatment group (n=31)
Mean (SD) Median Mean (SD) Median
Post Opp. 1st Day of Group A: Pain Level on VAS 7.56 (1.33) 8.00 7.67 (1.00) 8.00
Post Opp. 2nd Week of Group A: Pain Level on VAS 5.89 (1.69) 6.00 4.56 (0.88) 5.00
Post Opp. 4th Week of Group A: Pain Level on VAS 5.00 (0.71) 5.00 2.22 (1.30) 2.00
Post Opp. 1st Day of Group A: Extension Lag in Degrees 5.00 (4.85) 5.00 7.33 (9.01) 5.00
Post Opp. 2nd Week of Group A: Extension Lag in Degrees 4.44 (4.93) 3.00 4.11 (4.49) 3.00
Post Opp. 4th Week of Group A: Extension Lag in Degrees 1.78 (3.03) .00 1.33 (3.32) .00

Table 3. Comparison of average values of Pain on Visual analogue scale and knee extension Lag in degrees between control and treatment groups.

Discussion

The main concern of this study was to establish evidence regarding the effectiveness of strengthening exercise regime versus functional training to restore extensor lag in patients after Total Knee Replacement. In previous studies, various protocols have been used showing variability in results for post-operative rehabilitation after TKR. Balance and functional training have been studied for their effectiveness in improving balance after TKR [6] but current study focuses on two different treatment regimens for correction of extensor lag. Current study has shown that the difference in effectiveness of strength training and functional training in reducing extensor lag was not significant. Significant improvement was found in the secondary outcome i.e. pain for the participants in interventional group. This supports the use of functional activities over strengthening exercises. These results would be helpful in improving quality of life of patients who are unable to get the outpatient physical therapy treatment and prefer a home based plan of exercise instead.

Strengthening through functional activities was used in this study because it has been seen that these exercises are not frequently prescribed as a home plan, which is possibly due to uncertainty in effectiveness of its outcomes [15]. Vuorenmaa et al. [13] have reported that home based exercises were not superior to the conventional physical therapy treatment provided on outpatient basis in reducing pain, disability and improving quality of life. These results are partly consistent with our results. Because this study’s results have shown that strengthening through functional activities had no significant difference from other strengthening methods in which patients have to regularly visit the physical therapy departments; so it can be recommended for the patients especially those belonging to remote areas. These exercise programs could be provided in form of videos and pamphlets to further reduce the cost and ensure the correct performance by the patients. Also in future, utilization of health services and cost minimization should be evaluated as primary outcome to find if strengthening through functional activities can offer significant financial advantages.

Conclusion

Both strength training and functional training were found equally effective in improving knee extension lag, however, functional training exercises resulted in significant reduction in post-operative knee pain compare to resistance training. It is recommended to make functional training exercises an essential part of physical rehabilitation post total knee replacement.

References